Package Base Details: linux-lqx

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-lqx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Keywords: bbr2 bfq futex pds proton zen
Submitter: akurei
Maintainer: sir_lucjan (damentz)
Last Packager: damentz
Votes: 158
Popularity: 1.16
First Submitted: 2011-08-08 16:08 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-04-19 15:10 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

damentz commented on 2020-08-31 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-21 18:25 (UTC) by damentz)

Official binaries of linux-lqx, linux-lqx-headers, and linux-lqx-docs are now available: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Unofficial_user_repositories#liquorix

Signing key import instructions: sudo pacman-key --keyserver hkps://keyserver.ubuntu.com --recv-keys 9AE4078033F8024D && sudo pacman-key --lsign-key 9AE4078033F8024D

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 .. 120 Next › Last »

shivik commented on 2013-11-15 06:29 (UTC)

@AnAkkk - why out of date? http://liquorix.net/sources/ still says 3.11.7-1

Wintershade commented on 2013-09-22 23:13 (UTC)

Alright, thanks man :) I deleted everything and dl'ed the fresh tarball. It works now.

shivik commented on 2013-09-22 21:04 (UTC)

I updated the package to 3.11. 3.10 stuff can be found here: http://liquorix.herobo.com/linux-lqx/

shivik commented on 2013-09-22 19:45 (UTC)

I checked and all checksums check out. (Deleted configs,3.10.12-1 patch,etc and did a makepkg -S) Actually config.* files have been the same for a while. So very strange to get checksum error there. Must be something on your part. Get the tarball,extract into a new directory and try again. https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/li/linux-lqx/linux-lqx.tar.gz You can copy your linux-3.10.tar.xz to avoid downloading that again.

Wintershade commented on 2013-09-22 17:33 (UTC)

Hey guys, a quick question. I just pulled all the source files from here (twice, manually and through yaourt), and I'm getting this error... ==> Validating source files with sha512sums... linux-3.10.tar.xz ... Passed 3.10.12-1.patch.gz ... FAILED config.i386 ... FAILED config.amd64 ... FAILED linux-lqx.preset ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! so supposedly the 3.10.12-1 patch, as well as the config.* files aren't what they're supposed to be. What gives? Am I missing something, or doing something wrong? TIA

jjdekroon commented on 2013-09-22 08:45 (UTC)

Okay, thanks for clearing that up, and I understand your decision. Also I have a remark on the latest kernel source. It seems aufs doesn't function on my system. I saw it is included in the kernel configuration. Greetings PsychoGame

damentz commented on 2013-09-22 00:22 (UTC)

Will BFS make a comeback? Probably not. The bugs in BFS are minor but noticeable. This biggest bug that's yet to be fixed is time keeping. This was documented heavily on the liquorix forums and lead me to choosing CFS over BFS with heavy configuration modifications. To answer your last question, just choose the zen-tune custom configuration, it will set rr_interval to 3 and change a few more defaults to improve performance.

jjdekroon commented on 2013-09-21 20:57 (UTC)

I have a small question about bfs. Will BFS make a comeback as standard scheduler in the builds in the future? Are the bugs which made the switch from BFS to CFS still existing in the latest kernel releases? Also if I want to compile the Liquorix kernel myself with BFS, what configuration do you recommend for the lowest latency? Greetings PsychoGame

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 .. 120 Next › Last »