Package Base Details: linux-next-git

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Submitter: Nefelim4ag
Maintainer: sir_lucjan
Last Packager: sir_lucjan
Votes: 13
Popularity: 0.022483
First Submitted: 2014-10-12 19:04
Last Updated: 2019-11-13 00:22

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

Nefelim4ag commented on 2014-10-22 01:13

Nefelim4ag commented on 2014-10-12 19:07
Created temporarily, this is a linux-git code with your env var and its cloning into yaourt-build

Nefelim4ag commented on 2014-10-11 23:47

@denspirit, may be you know why yaourt feature DEVELSRCDIR="/var/tmp/yaourt-build"
Working for other git packages like linux-git and zsh-git
But not work for linux-next package?

denspirit commented on 2014-10-11 19:03

config.* files (as well as PKGBUILD) were mindlessly stolen from linux-git package, and I apologize for that.

Nefelim4ag commented on 2014-10-11 18:40

using env var for config is awesome, thanks. Just a big thanks.

brenton commented on 2014-05-09 00:50

a suggestion to make the PKGBUILD a bit better:

pkgver=next.$(date -u +%Y%m%d)

denspirit commented on 2013-11-18 00:40

Linux-next is an experimental kernel branch, so shipping some default configs is slightly impractical, in my humble opinion. Old PKGBUILD did not use any default configs and relied on user.
I stole/inherited a PKGBUILD and default kernel configs from linux-git by xduugu, correcting package names where necessary.
X.509 crypto-module could not build,possibly due to a code error, so I disabled it in config.x86-64 and config.i686.
While I am posting this PKGBUILD, modules are still building, so I will be sure it works only at morning. If something goes wrong, I will update PKGBUILD again.

enunes commented on 2013-11-17 22:18

I agree. There's also linux-git in the AUR which at least is already updated to the newer git PKGBUILD format.

denspirit commented on 2013-11-17 22:17

Relying on makepkg new VCS capability is not suitable for large projects due to the deletion of 'src' every time to update.
Will be uploaded soon. Sorry for inconvenience.

paraxor commented on 2013-11-17 22:15

Perhaps it would be prudent to redo this package based on core/linux.