@Alger
I had the same problem...executing sudo ln -s /usr/src/linux-2.6.38-pf/ /lib/modules/2.6.38-pf/build all was fine with nvidia drivers
Search Criteria
Package Base Details: linux-pf
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-pf.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | bbr bbr3 kernel ksm linux linux-pf pf-kernel uksm uksmd v4l2loopback zstd |
| Submitter: | nous |
| Maintainer: | post-factum |
| Last Packager: | post-factum |
| Votes: | 210 |
| Popularity: | 0.33 |
| First Submitted: | 2011-07-24 12:01 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-04-29 09:28 (UTC) |
Packages (2)
shadowed87 commented on 2011-03-26 16:35 (UTC)
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-03-26 15:51 (UTC)
@CheariX Yaourt can't detect because you have other name package installed like kernel26-pf-core2 so it's differ from this as far as i think this is the reason
CheariX commented on 2011-03-26 15:17 (UTC)
Why can't yaourt detect new version?
This problem was from 2.6.37-pf2 up to 2.6.37-pf6 and now with 2.6.38, yaourt still thinks kernel26-pf is up to date...
shadowed87 commented on 2011-03-26 14:46 (UTC)
why not these patches?
http://chakra-project.org/sources/kernel26/patches/38
instead of
http://chakra-project.org/sources/kernel26/patches/37
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-03-26 14:28 (UTC)
aren't we need a simlink /lib/modules/build/2.6.38-pf/build to /usr/src/linux-2.6.38-pf or something like this , because i can't build ati properity driver now
nous commented on 2011-03-26 13:47 (UTC)
@graysky - Thanks for the heads-up, but as far as BFS is concerned, I'm just following the pfkernel patchset, whose author anyway is a close follower of CK's blog and I suspect he'll implement this promising patch very soon.
graysky commented on 2011-03-26 13:37 (UTC)
Nous - you might wanna add this patch to ck1: http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2011/03/bfs-and-optimising-global-scheduler-for.html
nous commented on 2011-03-26 13:17 (UTC)
Alright, alright. Four kernel configuration options for all tastes.
<deleted-account> commented on 2011-03-26 08:21 (UTC)
I suggest write this to PKGBUILD:
msg "Run make menuconfig(console), gconfig(GTK based) or xconfig(Qt based) before build? (m/g/x/N)"
read answer
case "$answer" in
m | M) make menuconfig
cp -v .config ${startdir}/config.local
;;
g | M) make gconfig
cp -v .config ${startdir}/config.local
;;
x | X) make xcongig
cp -v .config ${startdir}/config.local
;;
default)
;;
esac
nous commented on 2011-03-26 02:18 (UTC)
It's very easy to put that in the PKGBUILD, but it's just another configuration option; I've also been asked to use xconfig or gconfig instead of menuconfig. It would be rather annoying for most people to have the PKGBUILD asking a ton of questions before actually building the package, while one could just issue 'sed -i s/menuconfig/nconfig/ PKGBUILD' before makepkg.
Pinned Comments
post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:30 (UTC)
Official binary builds for various x86_64 μ-arches are available here.
post-factum commented on 2023-09-25 20:20 (UTC)
pf-kernelfollows its own versioning scheme that doesn't depend on stable kernel releases versioning.X.Y.Zpackage version here corresponds tovX.Y-pfZrelease in the source code repo.