Search Criteria
Package Details: todoist 0.19.0-1
Package Actions
- View PKGBUILD / View Changes
- Download snapshot
- Search wiki
- Flag package out-of-date
- 1 pending request
- Submit Request
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/todoist.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | todoist |
Description: | Todoist CLI Client, written in Golang. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/sachaos/todoist |
Licenses: | MIT |
Conflicts: | todoist, todoist-cli |
Provides: | todoist, todoist-cli |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | m-novikov (hmnd) |
Last Packager: | hmnd |
Votes: | 19 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2017-05-11 02:26 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-04-12 20:41 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- git (git-gitAUR) (make)
- go (go-gitAUR, gcc-go-gitAUR, gcc-go-snapshotAUR, gcc-go) (make)
- peco (peco-gitAUR) (optional) – for zsh functions script
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
Muflone commented on 2024-04-14 15:25 (UTC)
@hmnd @m-novikov please submit a todoist-cli package and later request a merge
tronicdude commented on 2023-11-28 21:26 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-28 21:33 (UTC) by tronicdude)
This should absolutely be renamed
todoist-cli
, this is sillySacro commented on 2023-11-06 21:40 (UTC)
In which case there's also an issue with the
todoist-appimage
package, it shouldn't be doing that.Yes, and the
1password-cli
app looks for the todoist cli attodoist
, that not working brought me here.There's a convention not to change package names just because another package conflicts, especially if that other package is doing something wrong.
Sure, rename it, then I can just add it back as
todoist
, with the original binary name.PC2022 commented on 2023-11-05 23:13 (UTC)
I'd also go further, and suggest this package be renamed to
todoist-cli
, since thats exactly what it providesBut ultimately, it's not my decision to make
PC2022 commented on 2023-11-05 23:10 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-05 23:14 (UTC) by PC2022)
I'm not the package maintainer, so I'm not sure what you mean by this.
I made a suggestion that the binaries be renamed, and it was accepted by @m-novikov
To me, it makes no sense that a set of supplmentary cli tools are masquerading as
todoist
If you install the AppImage from the todoist website, then sure. But I think the first port of call for most Arch users, would be to look in AUR first.
In which case, there is a
todoist-appimage
package, which installs the gui app to/usr/bin/todoist
There is a convention here, in much the same way the
1password
package will install the gui app, but1password-cli
will install supplementary cli tools.Sacro commented on 2023-11-05 22:50 (UTC)
Please don't rename binaries at your own request.
I don't see a native app, fairly sure their app is electron based and is called "Todoist-linux-x86_64-8.9.4.AppImage", I don't see how they conflict.
1password refers to it using the name the developer gave it.
I've no idea why you think the official todoist app conflicts.
PC2022 commented on 2023-11-05 00:12 (UTC)
@sacro - The binaries in this package were renamed at my request
Maybe I've misunderstood, but I feel like the real issue is your github and CLI tools are named building as 'todoist', which conflicts with the native todoist app.
How do you envision your CLI tools should sit alongside the official todoist app, if they are not renamed to todoist-cli?
Sacro commented on 2023-11-04 18:40 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-04 18:42 (UTC) by Sacro)
Here's a much neater PKGBUILD,
Sacro commented on 2023-11-04 17:56 (UTC)
Please can you not rename binaries, other tools such as 1password can't find it if it has a different name.
hmnd commented on 2023-04-12 20:48 (UTC)
@terjestrand could you try now? If you still get a conflict try pacaur -Sy todoist-cli
1 2 3 4 Next › Last »