Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.10-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.23
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-26 13:15 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (7)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 .. 308 Next › Last »

dkaylor commented on 2012-05-09 12:56 (UTC)

@graysky - regarding the current state of uksm patches, what's your take on any performance benefit at all, especially when compilied in with BFS? @xianai - any thoughts on the above? Do you still have plans for mainlining, or are you resigned to the BFS/BFQ route?

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 09:20 (UTC)

No possible. Needs to be compiled into the kernel at this point as far as I can tell. If you want that code, you'll have to compile from the AUR.

kyak commented on 2012-05-09 08:04 (UTC)

Do you guys know if it is possible to activate uksm from userland (or at least from kernel command line)? I'm asking because i'm using repo-ck kernel (so i can't enable uksm at build time) and uksm is definitely lacking documentation (in English, at least) - so i can't any information.

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 01:26 (UTC)

Thanks for the info. I updated 3.3.5-1 with the new uksm patch and again did not bump the PKGVER. Enjoy. @Lawliet - what does the linux-ck-uksm package offer that the linux-ck package doesn't offer? They seem to be redundant, no? Would you be supportive to have the AUR devs remove it?

Lawliet commented on 2012-05-08 08:49 (UTC)

graysky: Sorry, the URL is wrong.. Sorry, my fail... right URL is: http://kerneldedup.org/download/uksm/0.1.1.1/patches/uksm-0.1.1.1-for-v3.3.ge.5.patch

xianai commented on 2012-05-08 08:38 (UTC)

BTW, The name uksm-0.1.1.1-for-v3.3.ge.5.patch means this uksm-0.1.1.1 patch is for upstream kernel v3.3.y where y is currently >= 5 ("ge" means "greater than or equal to"). e.g. We will file a new patch named uksm-0.1.1.1-for-v3.3.ge.10.patch in case there is a patch confilct from upstream v3.3.10.

xianai commented on 2012-05-08 08:32 (UTC)

Hi graysky, Lawliet, Oh, sorry, The correct URL for newest uksm-0.1.1.1 patch should be http://kerneldedup.org/download/uksm/0.1.1.1/patches/uksm-0.1.1.1-for-v3.3.ge.5.patch

hepha commented on 2012-05-08 07:52 (UTC)

patching file tools/include/tools/be_byteshift.h The next patch would create the file tools/include/tools/le_byteshift.h, which already exists! Assume -R? [n] n Apply anyway? [n] n how to do?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 .. 308 Next › Last »