Package Details: ananicy-git 1.13.1.r5.g5d86902-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: ananicy-git
Description: Ananicy - is Another auto nice daemon, with community rules support
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: Nefelim4ag
Maintainer: Nefelim4ag
Last Packager: Nefelim4ag
Votes: 20
Popularity: 1.261686
First Submitted: 2016-04-30 01:59
Last Updated: 2017-06-06 00:25

Latest Comments

Tjuh commented on 2017-03-30 11:01

Weird, I've been this for quite a while and never had single problem with it.

Nefelim4ag commented on 2017-03-30 07:55

@PythonNut, i think it's because you system try stop ananicy in the start of processing rules.
I add workaround by specify start/stop timeout to 5s,try it.

PythonNut commented on 2017-03-29 23:24

For some reason, this package delays shutdown for me by about a minute and a half due to a systemd "stop job". Any idea why this is happening?

Nefelim4ag commented on 2017-01-29 00:30

@Supplantr, thanks, fixed

Supplantr commented on 2017-01-28 20:18

package() should contain make install. Currently this package doesn't install anything.

Nefelim4ag commented on 2016-12-04 14:54

just add something like:

If you specify empty line with name, this rule with this name, will be ignored.
I.E. you don't need to delete rules, ananicy allow overwrite rules.

Tjuh commented on 2016-12-04 14:24

Well whenever I compile this pkg, I end up deleting half if not more of the rule files I don't need. Imo it's easier to delete a few unneeded application lines in a central rule file, but like I said, it was a just a suggestion.

Nefelim4ag commented on 2016-12-01 20:33

@Tjuh, more efficient for that?
Only that can be achieved by this, is only inode saving in fs
So i prefer have file per application, instead of one file for all rules, it's not add any complexity, but add easy overview of "supported" applications.

Tjuh commented on 2016-11-30 21:16

Just a suggestion, but since the rule files in /etc/ananicy.d/ all have the same syntax, would it not be more efficient to have one rule file for all those applications?

For example, instead of:

# family of tools designed to build, test and package software:
NAME=cmake NICE=19 IOCLASS=best-effort IONICE=7

# make - GNU make utility to maintain groups of programs
NAME=make NICE=19 SCHED=idle IOCLASS=best-effort IONICE=7


NAME=cmake NICE=19 IOCLASS=best-effort IONICE=7
NAME=make NICE=19 SCHED=idle IOCLASS=best-effort IONICE=7

Nefelim4ag commented on 2016-11-17 09:51

@Tjuh, fixed

All comments