Search Criteria
Package Details: android-platform 33_r01-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/android-platform.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | android-platform |
Description: | Android SDK Platform, latest API |
Upstream URL: | http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html |
Keywords: | android development |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | android-platform-33 |
Provides: | android-platform-33 |
Submitter: | lestb |
Maintainer: | goetzc (ishitatsuyuki, Gioconda, florax, Skycoder42, Vrakfall, Kppqju77) |
Last Packager: | Kppqju77 |
Votes: | 182 |
Popularity: | 0.070111 |
First Submitted: | 2013-11-08 12:10 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-06-08 23:09 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
Required by (14)
- android-aarch64-qt6-base
- android-google-apis
- android-google-apis-armv7a-eabi
- android-google-apis-playstore-x86-64-system-image
- android-google-apis-playstore-x86-system-image
- android-google-apis-x86-64-22
- android-google-apis-x86-64-system-image
- android-google-apis-x86-system-image
- android-x86-64-system-image
- android-x86-system-image
- nodejs-cordova (optional)
- unity-editor-android
- unity-editor-beta-android
- unity-editor-lts-android
Latest Comments
Kppqju77 commented on 2021-08-26 20:19 (UTC)
@stef204 did you install android-platform through sdkmanager or android-studio directly? It seems that the update from 30 to 31 cannot be done because you already have it installed...
Kppqju77 commented on 2020-07-04 22:26 (UTC)
@petronny Hum OK, I didn't knew this subtility! I will try to do this soon. (Monday probably)
petronny commented on 2020-07-04 07:44 (UTC)
Hi, could you put the
depends
line insidepackage()
to make the package more easier to be built?Currently, this package can't be built in a clean chroot due to a bug of
devtools
. Putting thedepends
line insidepackage()
will help.Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-12 10:43 (UTC)
But in the meantime,
android-sdk-platform-tools
already updated to API 29.Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 15:51 (UTC)
@Skycoder42 Oh yeah, I didn't pay much attention. I just saw it was in the SDK manager and made a package for it. Actually, I think we should wait too then. Sorry for the false flagging. The version 29 package is available for it anyway.
Skycoder42 commented on 2019-06-11 10:26 (UTC)
@Vrakfall I know that platform 29 is out, but AFAIK it is still in beta status? The question is: should we update this package before it gets the official release? I personally think we should at least wait for RC1, but other opinions (especially by the other comaintainers) are welcome.
Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 04:22 (UTC)
Also, API 29 is out. I made the package
android-platform-29
if you want to just rip-off the PKGBUILD or I can also co-maintain this one. I haven't addressed theadb
/fastboot
issue there yet as I ran out of time to test it.Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-09 10:33 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-09 13:16 (UTC) by Vrakfall)
With the added
provides
statement in the official repo'sandroid-tools
package, shouldn't this just requireadb
andfastboot
? Does it even needadb
actually (and technically)?ishitatsuyuki commented on 2018-05-27 15:33 (UTC)
Downloaded three times from two different networks in Japan, and the checksum seems to be working for me. What I can tell from the comments is that either the Google guys seems to be messed up with two different versions of the zip, or maybe it's just a error HTML page.
arshlinux commented on 2018-03-07 18:14 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-07 18:15 (UTC) by arshlinux)
==> Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED
I have hash:
$ sha384sum platform-27_r01.zip
da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b platform-27_r01.zip
Can someone confirm and update?
blubbblubb commented on 2018-03-06 02:43 (UTC)
Not sure where the latest checksum came from but for me the zip actually has the checksum which was added on the 25th of February, not the newer one from the 3rd of March
Gioconda commented on 2018-03-03 15:20 (UTC)
Checksum updated.
bence.hornak commented on 2018-03-03 13:49 (UTC)
sha1sums=('dfda0862550768ed04a4fb0e03c322230aff9fdc')
apaatsio commented on 2018-02-28 11:42 (UTC)
Checksum validation fails with 27_r01-2. I'd rather not use the
--skipchecksums
flag since it, well, voids the whole point of having a checksum.serpil commented on 2018-02-27 20:05 (UTC)
if anyone having failures according to verification/validation, try removing your aur helper's directory from $HOME/.cache
alexjorgef commented on 2018-02-24 23:30 (UTC) (edited on 2018-02-24 23:30 (UTC) by alexjorgef)
if anyone using yaourt, skip checksum verification: $ yaourt -S android-platform --m-arg --skipchecksums
alexjorgef commented on 2018-02-24 23:20 (UTC)
"Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED
goetzc commented on 2018-02-17 14:48 (UTC)
Do you think that removing the checksum in this package would be an advantage, considering the multiple breaks?
arvalas5461 commented on 2018-02-16 19:55 (UTC)
Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED
Gioconda commented on 2018-02-15 08:03 (UTC)
Done
JSBmanD commented on 2018-02-14 22:19 (UTC)
Checksum is broken now too.
Gioconda commented on 2018-02-09 13:24 (UTC)
Updated
LeJeunot commented on 2018-02-09 12:41 (UTC)
Checksum is broken...
Gioconda commented on 2018-02-07 05:04 (UTC)
Checksum updated.
Gioconda commented on 2018-02-03 17:34 (UTC)
Fixed
DuBistKomisch commented on 2018-02-03 12:41 (UTC)
checksum broken yet again :P
Gioconda commented on 2018-01-31 00:38 (UTC)
Fixed.
amaura commented on 2018-01-30 22:17 (UTC)
checksum broke again
florax commented on 2018-01-28 20:10 (UTC)
Thanks. Updated
lucastracq commented on 2018-01-28 13:29 (UTC)
269d9373d55f0f93994401b9d733e98b599d42c680d6d4436a91232024c298bc1e3d717288f94f85c303b2c2c93e8dc5
Gioconda commented on 2018-01-21 23:14 (UTC)
Updated
kysumi commented on 2018-01-21 04:34 (UTC)
Checksum broken
da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b
florax commented on 2018-01-13 17:41 (UTC)
Thanks. Updated
MadMe commented on 2018-01-13 12:32 (UTC)
Checksum is broken again... 269d9373d55f0f93994401b9d733e98b599d42c680d6d4436a91232024c298bc1e3d717288f94f85c303b2c2c93e8dc5 google seems to be diligent...
goetzc commented on 2018-01-11 00:15 (UTC)
Updated.
Gioconda commented on 2018-01-09 22:38 (UTC)
Hey!, apparently the currently checksum isn't correct. Can you update it, please?
florax commented on 2017-12-23 19:42 (UTC)
The checksum for the
platform-27_r01.zip
was not valid to me. Updating to: "da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b" at the PKGBUILD solved it...petronny commented on 2016-11-07 11:26 (UTC)
twa022 commented on 2016-06-19 17:21 (UTC)
alkino commented on 2015-11-06 12:50 (UTC)
yan12125 commented on 2015-08-18 18:32 (UTC)
incomingstick commented on 2015-05-05 16:13 (UTC)
the-k commented on 2015-03-12 19:12 (UTC)
LucidComplex commented on 2015-02-23 16:34 (UTC)
lestb commented on 2014-12-19 12:53 (UTC)
Edgemaster commented on 2014-12-13 20:26 (UTC)
the-k commented on 2014-10-10 06:21 (UTC)