Package Details: android-platform 33_r01-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/android-platform.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: android-platform
Description: Android SDK Platform, latest API
Upstream URL: http://developer.android.com/sdk/index.html
Keywords: android development
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: android-platform-33
Provides: android-platform-33
Submitter: lestb
Maintainer: goetzc (ishitatsuyuki, Gioconda, florax, Skycoder42, Vrakfall, Kppqju77)
Last Packager: Kppqju77
Votes: 182
Popularity: 0.070111
First Submitted: 2013-11-08 12:10 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-06-08 23:09 (UTC)

Latest Comments

Kppqju77 commented on 2021-08-26 20:19 (UTC)

@stef204 did you install android-platform through sdkmanager or android-studio directly? It seems that the update from 30 to 31 cannot be done because you already have it installed...

Kppqju77 commented on 2020-07-04 22:26 (UTC)

@petronny Hum OK, I didn't knew this subtility! I will try to do this soon. (Monday probably)

petronny commented on 2020-07-04 07:44 (UTC)

Hi, could you put the depends line inside package() to make the package more easier to be built?

Currently, this package can't be built in a clean chroot due to a bug of devtools. Putting the depends line inside package() will help.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-12 10:43 (UTC)

But in the meantime, android-sdk-platform-tools already updated to API 29.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 15:51 (UTC)

@Skycoder42 Oh yeah, I didn't pay much attention. I just saw it was in the SDK manager and made a package for it. Actually, I think we should wait too then. Sorry for the false flagging. The version 29 package is available for it anyway.

Skycoder42 commented on 2019-06-11 10:26 (UTC)

@Vrakfall I know that platform 29 is out, but AFAIK it is still in beta status? The question is: should we update this package before it gets the official release? I personally think we should at least wait for RC1, but other opinions (especially by the other comaintainers) are welcome.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-11 04:22 (UTC)

Also, API 29 is out. I made the package android-platform-29 if you want to just rip-off the PKGBUILD or I can also co-maintain this one. I haven't addressed the adb/fastboot issue there yet as I ran out of time to test it.

Vrakfall commented on 2019-06-09 10:33 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-09 13:16 (UTC) by Vrakfall)

With the added provides statement in the official repo's android-tools package, shouldn't this just require adb and fastboot? Does it even need adb actually (and technically)?

ishitatsuyuki commented on 2018-05-27 15:33 (UTC)

Downloaded three times from two different networks in Japan, and the checksum seems to be working for me. What I can tell from the comments is that either the Google guys seems to be messed up with two different versions of the zip, or maybe it's just a error HTML page.

arshlinux commented on 2018-03-07 18:14 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-07 18:15 (UTC) by arshlinux)

==> Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED

I have hash:

$ sha384sum platform-27_r01.zip

da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b platform-27_r01.zip

Can someone confirm and update?

blubbblubb commented on 2018-03-06 02:43 (UTC)

Not sure where the latest checksum came from but for me the zip actually has the checksum which was added on the 25th of February, not the newer one from the 3rd of March

Gioconda commented on 2018-03-03 15:20 (UTC)

Checksum updated.

bence.hornak commented on 2018-03-03 13:49 (UTC)

sha1sums=('dfda0862550768ed04a4fb0e03c322230aff9fdc')

apaatsio commented on 2018-02-28 11:42 (UTC)

Checksum validation fails with 27_r01-2. I'd rather not use the --skipchecksums flag since it, well, voids the whole point of having a checksum.

serpil commented on 2018-02-27 20:05 (UTC)

if anyone having failures according to verification/validation, try removing your aur helper's directory from $HOME/.cache

alexjorgef commented on 2018-02-24 23:30 (UTC) (edited on 2018-02-24 23:30 (UTC) by alexjorgef)

if anyone using yaourt, skip checksum verification: $ yaourt -S android-platform --m-arg --skipchecksums

alexjorgef commented on 2018-02-24 23:20 (UTC)

"Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED

goetzc commented on 2018-02-17 14:48 (UTC)

Do you think that removing the checksum in this package would be an advantage, considering the multiple breaks?

arvalas5461 commented on 2018-02-16 19:55 (UTC)

Validating source files with sha384sums... platform-27_r01.zip ... FAILED

Gioconda commented on 2018-02-15 08:03 (UTC)

Done

JSBmanD commented on 2018-02-14 22:19 (UTC)

Checksum is broken now too.

Gioconda commented on 2018-02-09 13:24 (UTC)

Updated

LeJeunot commented on 2018-02-09 12:41 (UTC)

Checksum is broken...

Gioconda commented on 2018-02-07 05:04 (UTC)

Checksum updated.

Gioconda commented on 2018-02-03 17:34 (UTC)

Fixed

DuBistKomisch commented on 2018-02-03 12:41 (UTC)

checksum broken yet again :P

Gioconda commented on 2018-01-31 00:38 (UTC)

Fixed.

amaura commented on 2018-01-30 22:17 (UTC)

checksum broke again

florax commented on 2018-01-28 20:10 (UTC)

Thanks. Updated

lucastracq commented on 2018-01-28 13:29 (UTC)

269d9373d55f0f93994401b9d733e98b599d42c680d6d4436a91232024c298bc1e3d717288f94f85c303b2c2c93e8dc5

Gioconda commented on 2018-01-21 23:14 (UTC)

Updated

kysumi commented on 2018-01-21 04:34 (UTC)

Checksum broken

da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b

florax commented on 2018-01-13 17:41 (UTC)

Thanks. Updated

MadMe commented on 2018-01-13 12:32 (UTC)

Checksum is broken again... 269d9373d55f0f93994401b9d733e98b599d42c680d6d4436a91232024c298bc1e3d717288f94f85c303b2c2c93e8dc5 google seems to be diligent...

goetzc commented on 2018-01-11 00:15 (UTC)

Updated.

Gioconda commented on 2018-01-09 22:38 (UTC)

Hey!, apparently the currently checksum isn't correct. Can you update it, please?

florax commented on 2017-12-23 19:42 (UTC)

The checksum for the platform-27_r01.zip was not valid to me. Updating to: "da778b2688355151e55fc1fe7763b67c087470c2afd1122007c04d58153c27bdcd5bb4ee0ca423e4e84bad243a87b95b" at the PKGBUILD solved it...

petronny commented on 2016-11-07 11:26 (UTC)

Please update it to r25

twa022 commented on 2016-06-19 17:21 (UTC)

The source directory in platform-24_r01.zip is 'android-N' which is not picked up by the grep command as written. I changed to: find "${srcdir}" -maxdepth 1 -mindepth 1 -type d | grep -P 'android-([0-9]+(\. [0-9]*)*$|[A-Z])' | while read directory; do

alkino commented on 2015-11-06 12:50 (UTC)

/opt/android-sdk is owned by (at least) android-sdk, android-sdk-build-tools, android-sdk-platform-tools and android-platform. All chmod it as 775 except android-platform to 755. Maybe you should follow them?

yan12125 commented on 2015-08-18 18:32 (UTC)

API 23 is released.

incomingstick commented on 2015-05-05 16:13 (UTC)

yaourt output when updating: aur/android-platform 21_r02-2 -> 22_r02-1

the-k commented on 2015-03-12 19:12 (UTC)

Out-of-date now.

LucidComplex commented on 2015-02-23 16:34 (UTC)

Sorry, flagged out-of-date by mistake. Was going to cancel, but was not quick enough to cancel.

lestb commented on 2014-12-19 12:53 (UTC)

Fixed the bug

Edgemaster commented on 2014-12-13 20:26 (UTC)

This package doesn't populate any files under /opt/android-sdk/platforms/ It looks like the regex in the PKGBUILD is broken, 'android-[0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?$' gives me no results, modifying it to 'android-[0-9]+(\.[0-9]*)?' seems to work.

the-k commented on 2014-10-10 06:21 (UTC)

The latest platform is version 20 - Android 4.4W. Please, update the package. You can use the following settings: _rev=r01 _sdkver=4.4W _apilevel=20 sha512sums=('dea315fec175dee50d98cea96bfcb2d59f25146a1cb35ecbd7702c66de7411b605f1ac8f6575f270dcb25718a9e4972bffbb13d203a59dfc0cd505b23f21d420')