Package Details: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc 13.2.0-10

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc
Description: The GNU Compiler Collection
Upstream URL: https://gcc.gnu.org
Licenses: GPL, custom, LGPL, FDL
Conflicts: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage1, arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage2
Provides: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage1, arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage2
Replaces: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage1, arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc-stage2
Submitter: tavianator
Maintainer: wgottwalt
Last Packager: wgottwalt
Votes: 78
Popularity: 0.170439
First Submitted: 2015-09-14 15:41 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-02-11 05:09 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

tavianator commented on 2017-02-03 00:27 (UTC)

@Hi-Angel: You should install the entire base-devel group for building packages. From https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#makedepends: > Note: The group base-devel is assumed to be already installed when building with makepkg. Members of this group should not be included in makedepends array.

Hi-Angel commented on 2017-01-24 12:59 (UTC)

Please, add bison to dependencies.

xoac commented on 2016-11-16 14:48 (UTC)

@tavianator It is normal that there is no libstdc++.a? My linker yell: /usr/bin/arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld: cannot find -lstdc++ I need to compile my application static. If I compile without `-static` everything works fine!

tavianator commented on 2016-07-29 21:12 (UTC)

@1ace: What patch?

1ace commented on 2016-07-29 09:03 (UTC)

Your patch doesn't apply anymore, looks like it needs to be rebased :)

tavianator commented on 2015-12-11 22:50 (UTC)

@zenolijo: I hear that it's possible to do a 2-stage cross-compiler build, but I'm not sure how. If anyone knows I'm happy to accept patches!

rpodgorny commented on 2015-11-04 22:08 (UTC)

@zenolijo: yup, just follow the dependency chain replacing gcc with the appropriate stages as you go...

zenolijo commented on 2015-11-04 20:49 (UTC)

This package conflicts with gcc-stage1 and 2, glibc has gcc-stage2 as a makedepend and glibc-headers depends on gcc-stage1. So i compile gcc two times, and then finally replace it with a third one? I have no experience with cross compiling, but is this really necessary?

FreddieChopin commented on 2015-10-16 16:15 (UTC)

Hmm... For now I'm using the toolchain provided by ArchLinuxArm. GCC accepts the options, but I'm reluctant to consider that as a confirmation of full compatibility (; I think that to work with multiple targets this toolchain would need a multilib, and this could be pretty complicated. The multilib configuration for bare-metal ARM microcontrollers is pretty complex, this one would probably be comparable (at least).

tavianator commented on 2015-10-16 14:41 (UTC)

@FreddieChopin: The only ARM devices I can test on are RPis, so I'm not really sure! But I assume that if gcc accepts the flags then it should work. The main thing I'd worry about is the calling conventions with glibc, you may have to recompile that.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »