Package Details: bottles 2021.9.14-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: bottles
Description: Easily manage wine and proton prefix
Upstream URL:
Keywords: Bottles Wine Wineprefixes
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: ragouel
Maintainer: francescomasala (brombinmirko)
Last Packager: francescomasala
Votes: 18
Popularity: 2.87
First Submitted: 2020-11-28 22:52
Last Updated: 2021-09-14 14:01

Pinned Comments

francescomasala commented on 2021-09-14 17:36

FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS (read before flagging or commenting!)
There is a new version out, why is the package not updated?

Don't worry, I'll update the package as soon as I have my computer at hand (we're talking about a day or so after the last release)

I have a problem with wine, should I blame bottles?

Absolutely not, try changing the version of wine in the settings or switch to another fork of wine.

Something is broken with the app, where do I report it?

You can either open an issue on github or use our internal bug reporting tool in bottles.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

brombinmirko commented on 2021-05-05 12:40

@shuriken wine is required due to a lack of dependencies, we are looking for these to bundle them with the package

shuriken commented on 2021-05-04 15:23

wine should be an (optional) dependency similar to the Lutris package.As it doesn't require system wine, proton or other runners. Still putting them as optional does make sense as its user preference. Thanks for this great software brombinmirko. things like gamemode mangohud and other system runners can all be in optdepends as well.

brombinmirko commented on 2021-04-02 06:39

@brito at the current stage, Bottles does not recognize system components (wine, dxvk) but could do so with the new version v4.

brito commented on 2021-03-18 03:51

Would be nice if this used the dxvk-bin package, instead of downloading it in the user's home at first run.

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-03-06 18:48

This depends on gtk3 and python-gobject, see

Scrumplex commented on 2021-03-05 08:57

I noticed a few things that could be improved with the PKGBUILD:

  • arch should be any as there are no binaries in this package
  • sha256sums is empty, while the only source is an archive. Please generate a sha256 checksum for the archive (in my case c854fbc333703449e82ae36db1ae4bd285b64441aec97e372ac6459dfdfe3585). Tip: If you need to update the sha256sum for a later release you can use the tool updpkgsums from the pacman-contrib package
  • The file is missing a # Maintainer tag at the top

Most of these things can be checked automatically by using the tool namcap from the pacman-contrib package. Just run it against your PKGBUILD and a built package archive.


TrialnError commented on 2021-02-01 23:43

Two notes. Could you please add ${pkgname}- in front of the source line? Makes it easier for those, which use $SRCDEST. Additionally skipping the generation of checksums is in general only allowed for VCS builds. As this downloads an archive, checksums should be generated. So please revert that change.
Maintainer lines aren't removed from a PKGBUILD. If there is a change, it will be changed from Maintainer to Contributor

PsykeDady commented on 2021-01-12 21:07

Ehy man, new update here :D

PsykeDady commented on 2020-12-26 22:50

Ehy! new update :D can you please update!

ragouel commented on 2020-12-08 22:00

@PsykeDady, I looked at the AppImage, dependencies are ok. I fixed the URL issue. Cheers.