Package Details: btrfs-progs-git 6994_6.7.1_r0_g60abf7a9-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/btrfs-progs-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: btrfs-progs-git
Description: Btrfs filesystem utilities
Upstream URL: https://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org/index.php/Main_Page
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Conflicts: btrfs-progs
Provides: btrfs-progs
Submitter: None
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 62
Popularity: 0.000038
First Submitted: 2008-12-27 21:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-03 12:09 (UTC)

Required by (101)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

harre commented on 2021-05-12 16:49 (UTC)

hmm, now it seems both btrfs-scrub@.service and btrfs-scrub@.timer fails checksum

WorMzy commented on 2021-05-11 22:55 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, fixed.

harre commented on 2021-05-11 22:00 (UTC)

I get checksum failure:

==> Validating source files with md5sums... btrfs-progs ... Skipped initcpio-hook-btrfs ... Passed initcpio-install-btrfs ... Passed btrfs-scrub@.service ... FAILED btrfs-scrub@.timer ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! error downloading sources: btrfs-progs-git

WorMzy commented on 2020-11-29 17:45 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up, fixed.

milki commented on 2020-11-28 23:18 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-28 23:18 (UTC) by milki)

Looks like the source for btrfs-scrub@.timer has been updated: https://git.archlinux.org/svntogit/packages.git/commit/trunk/btrfs-scrub@.timer?h=packages/btrfs-progs&id=087f43d6119392c553e0eb41c9f491299d923c1b

New checksums are:

$ md5sum btrfs-scrub@.timer
40ac621390e93a934b9661adbcedf7a8  btrfs-scrub@.timer
$ sha1sum btrfs-scrub@.timer
f75f76ff1a760f6c710cf0d5ab1c52874fc5625c  btrfs-scrub@.timer

Soukyuu commented on 2016-05-22 17:49 (UTC)

Yes, thanks for the heads-up. I reported it on the mailing list, but didn't have time to post here.

WorMzy commented on 2016-05-21 22:16 (UTC)

Just FYI, this problem has been fixed now: http://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git/commit/550b508129f26940790ddb82f00a5412b37e8741

WorMzy commented on 2016-05-17 16:04 (UTC)

Strange, I can reproduce this, but only outside of a clean chroot. I beleive that it is caused by this commit: http://repo.or.cz/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git?a=commit;h=ebe5b1cc7885027521db3c1d16d84bd54cc1321b You should report it upstream. You could fix it by modifying the makefile in the prepare function, but I don't want to do this for a -git package.

Soukyuu commented on 2016-05-17 15:33 (UTC)

Can't seem to build this: =========================== /usr/bin/install -c -m644 -d 64-btrfs-dm.rules /home/myuser/aur/btrfs-progs-git/pkg/btrfs-progs-git/usr/lib/udev/rules.d /usr/bin/install: cannot create directory ‘64-btrfs-dm.rules’: File exists Makefile:400: recipe for target 'install' failed make: *** [install] Error 1 ==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package() ===========================

WorMzy commented on 2014-06-29 15:21 (UTC)

For a while now, this package has basically become a mirror of the btrfs-progs package in core/, and the integration branches have become what this used to be, albeit somewhat more experimental. Unless anyone has any objections, I will change the PKGBUILD to pull in the btrfs-progs release candidates form the unstable repository. The latest of these is currently 3.15-rc3 [1], and lags behind integration-20140627 by about 50 commits. This will mean that this package will potentially less stable (the hint was in the repository name), and may come as a shock to some users; especially since, historically, this package was recommended over core/ due to upstream stalling at v0.19/v0.20-rc1. If you want to keep using stable btrfs-progs, I recommend that you use the package in core/. Anyone who wants to test the new PKGBUILD before it goes live, can find it here: [2]. Cheers. [1] http://repo.or.cz/w/btrfs-progs-unstable/devel.git/commit/2d4697d27501889823be71427ac06941b7508679 [2] https://github.com/WorMzy/PKGBUILDs/blob/332d8d59f443c2eb788e0b6eb4f1d8966aa9fd1a/btrfs-progs-git/PKGBUILD