Search Criteria
Package Details: can-utils 2023.03-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/can-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | can-utils |
Description: | Linux-CAN / SocketCAN user space applications |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/linux-can/can-utils |
Keywords: | can canbus Linux-CAN SocketCAN |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Conflicts: | can-utils-git |
Submitter: | GPereira |
Maintainer: | pschichtel |
Last Packager: | pschichtel |
Votes: | 12 |
Popularity: | 0.31 |
First Submitted: | 2018-02-15 12:05 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-12-10 14:28 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- cmake (cmake-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- ninja (ninja-kitwareAUR, ninja-memAUR, ninja-fuchsia-gitAUR, ninja-gitAUR, ninja-jobserverAUR) (make)
Required by (5)
- can-doc-git (optional)
- can-isotp-dkms-git (optional)
- can-tests-git (optional)
- canopenlinux-git (optional)
- ixxat-socketcan (optional)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
pschichtel commented on 2020-02-05 13:33 (UTC) (edited on 2020-02-05 13:34 (UTC) by pschichtel)
Is this package still being maintained? 2020.02.* release are available.
banis commented on 2019-12-23 09:41 (UTC)
I've got an error while building the package due to a missing symbol (SIOCGSTAMP) definition. I've solved the error by adding "#include <linux/sockios.h>" (https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Linux_headers_5.2_porting_notes/SIOCGSTAMP) in the following files: can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/isotpsniffer.c can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/cansniffer.c can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/canlogserver.c can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/isotpdump.c can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/slcanpty.c can-utils/src/can-utils-2018.02.0/isotpperf.c
pschichtel commented on 2019-01-03 16:30 (UTC)
Can confirm etskinner's comment.
etskinner commented on 2018-12-22 05:37 (UTC) (edited on 2018-12-22 05:38 (UTC) by etskinner)
This builds successfully and appears to work fine on armv7h. Could you add that to the arch list?
GPereira commented on 2018-03-03 16:13 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-03 16:13 (UTC) by GPereira)
@torkelatgenet added, thanks!
torkelatgenet commented on 2018-03-02 14:42 (UTC)
Could you add 'armv6h' to arch, i've tested and it works.
GPereira commented on 2018-02-15 23:35 (UTC)
@Eschwartz Thanks for the review, Hope it is all ok now
eschwartz commented on 2018-02-15 16:21 (UTC)
arch=('any')
is wrong, as the resulting package includes compiled binaries.Running
tar
yourself is wrong, since makepkg already extracts tarballs from source, and runningpwd
is ugly and pointless.The package should not provide conflict or replace anything, as it is the job of the -git package to do so (which it does), and in any event packages do not "provide" themselves, they are themselves already.
The source will conflict with any other packages having the same version, see the warning at https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#source
Instead, use
The _pkgname variable is totally pointless, just use
cd "${srcdir}/${pkgname}-${pkgver}"
like every other package in the AUR.Skipping the sha256sums is wrong, as download integrity checks are important unless you use git which already handles this. You likely copied this from the git PKGBUILD and did not update it when you switched from git to a tarball.
libtool is part of base-devel and should be removed from the makedepends.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2