Package Details: chromium-dev 60.0.3100.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/chromium-dev.git (read-only)
Package Base: chromium-dev
Description: The open-source project behind Google Chrome (Dev Channel)
Upstream URL: http://www.chromium.org
Licenses: BSD
Submitter: None
Maintainer: sl1pkn07
Last Packager: sl1pkn07
Votes: 150
Popularity: 2.107121
First Submitted: 2010-05-17 09:04
Last Updated: 2017-05-18 13:28

Dependencies (38)

Required by (3)

Sources (13)

Latest Comments

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-05-13 18:53

no. you need rebuild chromium-dev

symlink missing libraries is mala praxis

Shadowwalker commented on 2017-05-13 18:48

If you find an error saying /usr/lib/chromium-dev/chromium-dev: error while loading shared libraries: libwebp.so.6: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory
you can fix it like this

sudo ln -s /usr/lib64/libwebp.so.7 /usr/lib64/libwebp.so.6

jimmybot commented on 2017-05-12 03:59

Nice job on the very quick update :)

axfelix commented on 2017-05-08 17:37

Does this build not contain the new support for native notifications on Linux? Is that somehow only in Chrome rather than Chromium?

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-05-03 13:57

@M4P9be3w0u

done

M4P9be3w0u commented on 2017-05-02 22:52

I had to modify to the file "vaapi_patch_r0.patch" to compile version 60.0.3080.5-1 with vaapi enabled. Find the patch file that worked for me here: https://pastebin.com/qMH50eKS . (Disclaimer: not sure if this is the right place to poste this. May not work for eveyone.)

LordAro commented on 2017-04-18 09:56

oh indeed, that's how i built the package in the end.
the question is whether the PKGBUILD *should* be able to handle being called in separate steps. Should probably take this to a mailing list...

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-04-17 16:53

try with plain makepkg ;) (without options)

LordAro commented on 2017-04-17 16:43

I'm not convinced it is pacaur's bug though - it's this PKGBUILD that failed to build with makepkg -o && makepkg -es . I'll be quite happy to raise a bug report with pacaur if you can show that your PKGBUILD is doing it "correctly" (with documentation or whatever)

sl1pkn07 commented on 2017-04-16 12:33

open bug in pacaur. nothing to do in the pkgbuild

All comments