Package Details: claws-mail-git 3.16.0.r24.g93eaaa941-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/claws-mail-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: claws-mail-git
Description: A GTK+ based e-mail client - git checkout
Upstream URL: http://www.claws-mail.org/
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: claws-mail, claws-mail-extra-plugins
Provides: claws, claws-mail
Replaces: claws-mail-extra-plugins, sylpheed-claws
Submitter: eworm
Maintainer: eworm
Last Packager: eworm
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.001743
First Submitted: 2013-03-21 16:57
Last Updated: 2018-01-30 09:55

Dependencies (38)

Required by (3)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2018-01-27 16:53

For your very information

[rocketmouse@archlinux aur]$ pacman -Q enchant claws-mail-git

enchant 2.2.1-1

claws-mail-git 3.16.0.r24.g93eaaa941-1

I build claws-mail-git 3.16.0.r24.g93eaaa941-1 against enchant 2.2.1-1 and spell checking doesn't work anymore, while e.g. spell checking for

[rocketmouse@archlinux aur]$ pacman -Q evolution

evolution 3.26.4-2

still works.

I don't have time to write a bug report at the upstream bug tracker, but will forward it to the claws mailing list.

Perhaps the culprit is the same as for Xed:

"ion203 commented on 2018-01-27 01:47

Looks like /usr/bin/enchant was moved to /usr/bin/enchant-2 with 2.2.1 (https://www.archlinux.org/todo/enchant-221-rebuild/). I can just steal pluma's patch for the same issue." - https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/xed/

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2017-04-03 16:43

Hi,

building Claws 3.15.0.r17.g2736853ff fails. A workaround is commenting out the related prepare lines.

Regards,
Ralf

[rocketmouse@archlinux claws-mail-git]$ makepkg -s
[snip]
==> Starting prepare()...
patching file src/gtk/about.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 820.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file src/gtk/about.c.rej
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().
Aborting...

[rocketmouse@archlinux claws-mail-git]$ diff PKGBUILD PKGBUILD.o
61,62c61,62
< #patch -Np1 < "${srcdir}/claws-timestamp.patch"
< #git update-index --assume-unchanged src/gtk/about.c
---
> patch -Np1 < "${srcdir}/claws-timestamp.patch"
> git update-index --assume-unchanged src/gtk/about.c
87d86
< --build=$(uname -m)-arch-linux-gnu \

[rocketmouse@archlinux claws-mail-git]$ makepkg -s
[snip]
==> Finished making: claws-mail-git 3.15.0.r17.g2736853ff-1 (Mon Apr 3 18:34:26 CEST 2017)

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2015-12-10 08:56

--enable-appdata is an unrecognized option, so you could remove it next
time you edit the PKGBUILD

eworm commented on 2014-12-24 13:10

flex belongs to base-devel group and is expected to be installed.

sulhan commented on 2014-12-24 05:33

Missing flex as dependency for make.

eworm commented on 2014-11-04 07:38

Feel free to change CHOST in /etc/makepkg.conf...

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2014-11-04 06:40

Please consider to add --build=$(uname -m)-arch-linux-gnu to the
configure options.

Without the header's X-Mailer line does show:
Claws Mail 3.11.1-11-g723df44 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
IMO it's nicer like that:
Claws Mail 3.11.1-11-g723df44 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu)

I'm not sure if the CHOST variable should be changed. Perhaps there's a
good reason not to add the distro's name. Anyway, for the X-Mailer line
there IMO is no reason to hide Arch Linux.

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-November/037739.html

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2014-11-04 06:40

Please consider to add --build=$(uname -m)-arch-linux-gnu to the
configure options.

Without the header's X-Mailer line does show:
Claws Mail 3.11.1-11-g723df44 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu)
IMO it's nicer like that:
Claws Mail 3.11.1-11-g723df44 (GTK+ 2.24.25; x86_64-arch-linux-gnu)

I'm not sure if the CHOST variable should be changed. Perhaps there's a
good reason not to add the distro's name. Anyway, for the X-Mailer line
there IMO is no reason to hide Arch Linux.

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-November/037739.html

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2014-11-04 06:38

I'm not sure if the CHOST variable should be changed. Perhaps there's a
good reason not to add the distros name. Anyway, for the X-Mailer line
there IMO is no reason to hide Arch Linux.

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-November/037739.html

Ralf_Mardorf commented on 2014-11-04 06:38

I'm not sure if the CHOST variable should be changed. Perhaps there's a
good reason not to add the distros name. Anyway, for the X-Mailer line
there IMO is no reason to hide Arch Linux.

https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/2014-November/037739.html

All comments