Package Details: collabora-online-server-nodocker_fi 23.05.9.4-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/collabora-online-server-nodocker.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: collabora-online-server-nodocker
Description: None
Upstream URL: https://www.collaboraoffice.com/code/
Licenses: MPL
Submitter: theYinYeti
Maintainer: HLFH
Last Packager: HLFH
Votes: 13
Popularity: 0.000162
First Submitted: 2017-10-13 20:12 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-26 11:37 (UTC)

Dependencies (11)

Required by (0)

Sources (94)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

kescherAUR commented on 2023-11-17 21:00 (UTC)

The code-brand checksum is failing once again

chrismax commented on 2023-09-07 11:50 (UTC)

The checksum of the code-brand package is incorrect. The validation check fails.

jkhsjdhjs commented on 2023-07-22 14:24 (UTC)

The checksums of the .deb files are currently incorrect, seems like upstream changed them.

9-r commented on 2023-07-05 13:45 (UTC)

@bjo: Not sure if I'm the right person for that. My knowledge of the ins and outs of collabora is rather superficial. But I'm happy to ping you / let you know if I notice something on the tiny instance I run as I did in the past with theYinYeti

bjo commented on 2023-07-05 13:30 (UTC)

@9-r Thanks for the hint. btw, would you like to co-maintain the package?

9-r commented on 2023-07-05 13:25 (UTC)

@bjo: How do you feel about removing libssl1.0.0 = openssl-1.0 from _upstream_equiv? I just checked and it seems the dependency to libssl1.0.0 has been removed from upsteam .deb-package and the collabora aur package builds just fine without it. The last upstream release of openssl 1.0.2 is now >3 years old, unmaintained and should not be considered safe anyway.

chrismax commented on 2023-01-26 14:09 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-26 14:34 (UTC) by chrismax)

If I edit the PKGBUILD to set my wanted language the integrity check (or checksum check) fails. The Error says that the size of the checksum array is different from the sources array.

bjo commented on 2022-12-17 10:49 (UTC)

@kescherAUR: Thanks for the hint, updated it.

@theYinYeti: Thanks for your work! "A bit unusual", yes ;) I hoped with 22.05.08 the ssl 1.0 dependency would be gone, but unfortunately not yet.

kescherAUR commented on 2022-12-17 10:48 (UTC)

Thanks a lot for the tmpfiles update!