Package Details: davical 1.1.7-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/davical.git (read-only)
Package Base: davical
Description: A server for calendar sharing
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.com/davical-project/davical
Licenses: GPL, LGPL
Submitter: mseiwald
Maintainer: foxxx0
Last Packager: foxxx0
Votes: 15
Popularity: 0.000835
First Submitted: 2010-12-04 18:45
Last Updated: 2018-02-13 09:50

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-15 15:15

updated. lemme know if there are issues.

zenlord commented on 2011-09-15 12:38

0.9.9.5 released without release notes - there should be a bunch of bugfixes

Anonymous comment on 2011-07-24 23:48

thanks, evaryont. New version submitted: made apache and postgresql optional dependencies. postgresql also optional, as it may be installed on a remote server.

evaryont commented on 2011-07-24 23:13

Perhaps removing apache from the dependencies, instead including it as an optional dependency? The reason is that I use nginx on my server, instead of Apache. PHP works fine with it, and others so it seems silly to me that the package explicitly depends on one server.

Anonymous comment on 2011-07-24 19:16

new version. let me know if there are things that should be improved.

cman commented on 2011-02-28 18:26

york,

After some experimentation, I found that these php extensions are needed:

extension=gettext.so
extension=iconv.so
extension=pdo_pgsql.so
extension=pgsql.so

Make sure that those are not commented in the php.ini file.

Anonymous comment on 2011-02-20 08:59

URLs need to be updated... /rscds/ does not exist.

Everything seems fairly straightforward expect that can't get davical to find the AWL libraries. I added a print get_ini('include_path') statement when it fails, and it shows .:/usr/share/pear:/usr/share/awl/inc <-- which does exist. owner = root, permissions = 755. I can't understand it (I even tried 777). I also tried setting the include_once directive with the hard coded path in always.php, but no go.

mseiwald commented on 2010-12-29 11:36

I disowned the package, you just have to take ownership now.

zenlord commented on 2010-12-29 11:32

OK - I have no experience with packaging, but with your work already done, I don't think I have a lot to do (although I was thinking of adding an install.sh) - how do we change maintainership?

mseiwald commented on 2010-12-29 11:10

Would you like to take over the package, zenlord? I don't use Arch on the server anymore, so I don't need it anymore.