Search Criteria
Package Details: exman 2066.8-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/exman.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | exman |
Description: | manuals for other systems |
Upstream URL: | https://git.causal.agency/exman |
Keywords: | docs documentation freebsd macos man manpage netbsd openbsd |
Licenses: | ISC |
Submitter: | stepnem |
Maintainer: | stepnem |
Last Packager: | stepnem |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000042 |
First Submitted: | 2021-09-26 12:27 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-06 10:19 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- man (mandoc-cvsAUR, man-db, mandoc)
- sh (dashbinshAUR, bash-devel-static-gitAUR, zshbinshAUR, bash-devel-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR, bash-gitAUR, bash)
- bmake (netbsd-pkgsrcAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
stepnem commented on 2022-07-18 07:00 (UTC)
@kusoneko: D'oh, thanks for the report! Let's give it another shot: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/commit/?h=exman&id=3c02e902d232fb7e11a3d5516bb9d913ca7e2d99
Quoting from the commit message:
While testing the 2062.73(-1) update, makepkg somehow managed to download a corrupted archive, which nevertheless contained all the correct content, and bsdtar (which makepkg uses) didn't even notice any problem (GNU tar/gzip does report "decompression OK, trailing garbage ignored").
Sorry 'bout that. I guess I'd better ask upstream to provide archive checksums to verify against.
kusoneko commented on 2022-07-18 00:05 (UTC)
The file exman-2062.73.tar.gz doesn't pass the sha256sums validity check from makepkg. Are you sure you put the right checksum in the PKGBUILD file?