Search Criteria
Package Details: foobar2000 1.6.11-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/foobar2000.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | foobar2000 |
Description: | An advanced freeware audio player (uses Wine) |
Upstream URL: | http://www.foobar2000.org |
Licenses: | custom |
Submitter: | None |
Maintainer: | supermario |
Last Packager: | supermario |
Votes: | 62 |
Popularity: | 0.001521 |
First Submitted: | 2010-05-07 18:02 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-05-16 07:28 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
Required by (24)
- foobar2000-component-audioscrobbler-bin
- foobar2000-component-beefweb-bin
- foobar2000-component-dsp-effect-bin
- foobar2000-component-jesus-bin
- foobar2000-component-musical-spectrum-bin
- foobar2000-component-np-simple-bin
- foobar2000-component-playcount-bin (optional)
- foobar2000-component-runcmd-bin
- foobar2000-component-scrobble-bin
- foobar2000-component-stop-on-error-bin
- foobar2000-component-texttools-bin (optional)
- foobar2000-component-ui-columns-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-albumlist-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-console-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-esplaylist-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-lyrics3-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-ptb-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-typefind-bin
- foobar2000-component-uie-vis-peakmeter-spectrum-bin
- foobar2000-component-upnp-bin
Latest Comments
Flupp commented on 2022-01-20 17:36 (UTC)
When starting on a fresh install (no Wine application ever executed), the startup script fails with:
With
the problem could easily be fixed. Maybe this should go into the script as well.
kode54 commented on 2022-01-06 02:00 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-06 02:01 (UTC) by kode54)
@Magotchi: and as you can see, the package is currently flagged out of date.
Oh, you filed that request. Carry on.
Magotchi commented on 2022-01-05 15:15 (UTC)
This currently fails to build because it ultimately downloads a "foobar2000_v1.6.9.exe" file where "foobar2000_v1.6.8.exe" is expected:
sctyboy commented on 2021-11-30 19:20 (UTC)
I've found that with wine 6.21 or 6.22 that foobar2000 fails to start: 6.21 0270:err:module:ntdll_init_syscalls syscall count mismatch 0 / 79 6.22 0238:err:module:ntdll_init_syscalls syscall count mismatch 0 / 96
If I rollback Wine to 6.17, it starts fine. I tried with a fresh wineprefix and the behavior was the same.
Has anyone encountered similar?
kode54 commented on 2021-11-22 02:18 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-22 02:20 (UTC) by kode54)
wget doesn't work directly on the /getfile/ URLs, it just retrieves a redirect page that usually contains a server side generated random ad for one of Spoon's many software products that Peter links to, because he also works for Spoon, who is indirectly sponsoring the development. The actual link is included in the page, which is the same filename on the /files/ path. The makepkg system follows the redirect just fine, somehow. Or maybe it doesn't.
magicgoose commented on 2021-11-21 14:42 (UTC)
@BachoSeven generally this means something sketchy is happening. I'd suggest try uploading these files to VirusTotal, also check what certificate is presented in browser when you visit foobar2000.org.
BachoSeven commented on 2021-11-21 14:12 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-21 14:17 (UTC) by BachoSeven)
@magicgoose I just did this:
Applied only edits 1: and 3: of your last comment (so the old url which doesn't specify which specific binary to get), and then built the package and I get the following sha256sum:
As far as I can tell, wget said it was using HTTPS successfully
And as I mentioned earlier, if I delete the
.exe
andmakepkg -s
again, I get different sum:magicgoose commented on 2021-11-21 12:52 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-21 12:52 (UTC) by magicgoose)
That's odd. I couldn't reproduce that from my connection. Was it without HTTPS errors all 3 times? What was the URL? Can you post these sums? (that way, later there's a chance people can compare if it matches any known malware, etc)
Any chance that these were incomplete downloads?
That would be too big for a comment. But there are just 3 edits:
1: Line 4, the one starting with
pkgver=
-- change topkgver=1.6.8
2: Line 12, the one starting with
source=
-- change tosource=("foobar2000_v$pkgver.exe::https://www.foobar2000.org/getfile/foobar2000_v$pkgver.exe"
3: Line 18, the one starting with
sha256sums=
-- change tosha256sums=('679ecdb3304e2fcefb7b5e087fba527e3a5921fcdbc24b4093bee05ab0fec7a0'
After that, it successfully built and installed for me.
(The only remaining issue is with missing wineprefix folder, I created it manually but didn't fix it in PKGBUILD. I don't have permissions to contribute anyway. But if author invited me, that would be cool btw. I did ask some time ago, but didn't get a response sadly.)
BachoSeven commented on 2021-11-21 12:20 (UTC)
could you paste the updated PKGBUILD?
BachoSeven commented on 2021-11-21 12:18 (UTC)
@magicgoose I just downloaded it 3 times and got 3 different sha-256 sums... what's going on
magicgoose commented on 2021-11-21 12:08 (UTC)
SHA-256 of the latest release (1.6.8) that I downloaded just now:
679ecdb3304e2fcefb7b5e087fba527e3a5921fcdbc24b4093bee05ab0fec7a0
magicgoose commented on 2021-11-21 12:02 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-21 12:06 (UTC) by magicgoose)
Would it be cool (legally, etc) to change the source to the versioned URL? I just checked and it works just fine:
"foobar2000_v$pkgver.exe::https://www.foobar2000.org/getfile/foobar2000_v$pkgver.exe"
snorlax212 commented on 2021-09-04 04:33 (UTC)
Thanks, after creating
~/.local/share/wineprefixes/
it starts to work. It would be nice to add support for foo_youtube component https://fy.3dyd.com/download/ (it can be installed but doesnt load any url)magicgoose commented on 2021-05-22 17:43 (UTC)
I would recommend against
--skipinteg
, it can be unsafe in case you accidentally get the wrong file (well, it's rare but...). Better is to download manually, check the hash(es) and edit hashes in PKGBUILD too.otterwise commented on 2021-05-21 16:50 (UTC)
If the .exe fails to download, you can manually edit the foobar version in PKGBUILD (with --menuedit and --mflags --skipinteg ; use at own risk!) to match the one on the official foobar2000 download page.
Nobody_8194 commented on 2021-02-18 11:54 (UTC)
You may need to manually create
~/.local/share/wineprefixes/
if it does not exists.kode54 commented on 2021-01-23 09:39 (UTC)
If you can trust me, a user who has access to the server hosting the download:
Rurisk commented on 2021-01-22 08:35 (UTC)
Hello, I'm getting the following error when trying to make the package:
Where can I find the sha256sum for the latest version?
MGM175 commented on 2020-07-10 19:17 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-10 19:17 (UTC) by MGM175)
Checksum codes:
sha256
e5f983c12b2eda9c1e0bc6de95413005b61953be9bd1401398c5ba72713f23fd
foobar2000_v1.5.5.exe
sha256
ebf5582c2aee5819058e0d2df0ca0696dd2215d42a855b82eb136221ad74a8a2
foobar2000_v1.6_beta_5.exe
DanEng1982 commented on 2020-07-10 12:02 (UTC)
Doesn't work because this package assumes/requires v1.5.4 but in fact it does download v1.5.5 which somehow doesn't fit the directory structure and therefore breaks.
It's a pity because not only is that a great music program but also it installs WINE as a dependency in a way that allowed me to run Ableton Live 10 out of the box.
rjt commented on 2020-05-30 06:49 (UTC)
Sure, I get the reasons for it.
I just would've liked it to be optional, as you suggested (I think it was a good suggestion!). Or at least been a bit of a smoother transition.
This's borked my installation, and I've had to manually create the prefix to get it working, as well as go by someone else's chosen directory structure. Pretty annoying. This's the only thing I regularly use wine for, so--
kode54 commented on 2020-05-30 04:07 (UTC)
Using unique prefixes per application is already good advice and frequently recommended by many wine using packages and launchers. Using a single default prefix for everything you install is a great way to find yourself frequently reinstalling everything.
rjt commented on 2020-05-30 02:40 (UTC)
I don't think hardcoding a path for the wine prefix is a good idea. Nor do I think forcing the use of a unique prefix is a good idea (it was suggested as optional).
MGM175 commented on 2020-05-26 16:01 (UTC)
Checksum for foobar2000_v1.5.4.exe:
SHA256: 838adc84c9d36312f82e333c8876ce9b653436f33912a00f879e52f99a1c8654
undu commented on 2020-04-13 14:22 (UTC)
A small change in foobar2000.sh does the trick to let foobar have it's own prefix: https://gitlab.com/unduthegun/foobar2000/-/tree/91ad678c84e0a579bdf5f7725e112b3863df2c38
kode54 commented on 2020-02-03 01:26 (UTC)
Suggestion: Optionally using its own dedicated Wine prefix?
fullmetal commented on 2019-11-15 02:28 (UTC)
Foobar fails for me on load
0009:err:module:import_dll Library zlib1.dll (which is needed by L"Z:\home\alex\.foobar2000\foobar2000.exe") not found 0009:err:module:import_dll Library shared.dll (which is needed by L"Z:\home\alex\.foobar2000\foobar2000.exe") not found 0009:err:module:LdrInitializeThunk Importing dlls for L"Z:\home\alex\.foobar2000\foobar2000.exe" failed, status c0000135
Issue is solved by cding into $progHome.
dekart811 commented on 2019-10-10 07:50 (UTC)
@supermario: Update to v1.4.8 993315168f76d1e91685805f6c746315c1cc34f73cfd44bf6bddab070897c2bf foobar2000_v1.4.8.exe
ManiacOfMadness commented on 2019-07-09 20:22 (UTC)
@supermario: Update to v1.4.6
94dd5b180928264f6e7504e9a35aa9e38bdbffad37f6af14e9a12e997fdc20a4 foobar2000_v1.4.6.exe
Kuiooo commented on 2019-06-28 00:47 (UTC)
Please change foobar2000_v1.4.4.exe to foobar2000-v1.4.5.exe
Dante commented on 2019-05-28 21:33 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-28 21:33 (UTC) by Dante)
"wine: Access denied." Many files lack the 004 permission.
kaari5 commented on 2019-03-17 03:52 (UTC)
@supermario: Update to v.1.4.3 1672c7435add7dc47d8b4e85cbe31b6906365a5443798dd97a8d9a87cd1544c3 foobar2000_v1.4.3.exe
Stealth commented on 2018-11-21 21:23 (UTC)
Package downloads the latest version of foobar, 1.4.1, instead of version 1.4 and fails due to ERROR: No more files foobar2000_v1.4.exe. This issue can be fixed by editing the PKGBUILD pkgver variable to 1.4.1 instead of pkgver=1.4 or by moving the downloaded foobar2000_v1.4.1.exe to foobar2000_v1.4.exe and then rebuilding
wuestengecko commented on 2018-09-15 12:39 (UTC)
Please add
StartupWMClass=foobar2000.exe
to the[Desktop Entry]
, this allows DEs to correctly associate the fb2k window with the launcher icon.xtd commented on 2017-04-30 13:19 (UTC)
eientei95 commented on 2016-12-25 13:56 (UTC) (edited on 2016-12-25 13:57 (UTC) by eientei95)
supermario commented on 2016-12-13 00:59 (UTC)
Aelius commented on 2016-12-10 21:05 (UTC)
supermario commented on 2016-12-10 00:03 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2016-12-04 23:46 (UTC)
Aelius commented on 2016-12-04 15:52 (UTC) (edited on 2016-12-04 16:18 (UTC) by Aelius)
Aelius commented on 2016-12-04 15:12 (UTC)
carrioncrow commented on 2016-09-26 16:24 (UTC)
Dante commented on 2016-09-25 08:33 (UTC) (edited on 2016-09-25 08:35 (UTC) by Dante)
carrioncrow commented on 2016-09-21 08:12 (UTC) (edited on 2016-09-23 08:55 (UTC) by carrioncrow)
supermario commented on 2016-07-03 10:52 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2016-07-03 02:47 (UTC)
abouvier commented on 2016-07-03 01:53 (UTC)
supermario commented on 2016-05-10 00:50 (UTC)
sentriz commented on 2016-05-09 20:10 (UTC)
sentriz commented on 2016-05-09 20:07 (UTC)
craeckie commented on 2015-11-24 20:07 (UTC)
supermario commented on 2015-11-24 13:33 (UTC)
craeckie commented on 2015-11-24 09:40 (UTC)
DaMoo commented on 2015-03-01 18:29 (UTC)
jakobw commented on 2015-01-09 18:14 (UTC)
kmicu commented on 2014-07-20 16:12 (UTC)
gijs commented on 2014-06-02 20:59 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2014-06-02 20:19 (UTC)
gijs commented on 2014-06-01 19:38 (UTC)
RubenKelevra commented on 2014-05-25 13:29 (UTC)
test0 commented on 2014-05-19 18:09 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2014-04-25 02:04 (UTC)
net147 commented on 2014-04-18 05:18 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-11-09 00:58 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-11-08 21:06 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-11-08 21:02 (UTC)
rtfreedman commented on 2013-11-08 17:23 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-11-08 16:14 (UTC)
supermario commented on 2013-11-08 06:02 (UTC)
bebR commented on 2013-07-11 12:44 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-07-10 23:38 (UTC)
rtfreedman commented on 2013-07-10 23:21 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-07-10 22:35 (UTC)
rtfreedman commented on 2013-07-10 21:28 (UTC)
bebR commented on 2013-07-10 18:30 (UTC)
rtfreedman commented on 2013-06-15 16:06 (UTC)
tea commented on 2013-06-14 12:43 (UTC)
commented on 2013-05-20 18:25 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-05-20 01:51 (UTC)
commented on 2013-05-19 20:47 (UTC)
deimos commented on 2013-05-18 18:12 (UTC)
commented on 2013-05-18 12:59 (UTC)
wlmeng11 commented on 2013-02-02 07:33 (UTC)
tea commented on 2013-01-29 01:38 (UTC)
commented on 2013-01-17 10:59 (UTC)
tea commented on 2013-01-13 14:35 (UTC)
tea commented on 2012-12-17 20:06 (UTC)
tea commented on 2012-12-17 20:03 (UTC)
commented on 2012-05-29 05:30 (UTC)
commented on 2011-03-20 15:33 (UTC)
L42y commented on 2011-03-11 01:34 (UTC)
commented on 2011-02-26 10:29 (UTC)
commented on 2011-02-26 01:12 (UTC)
commented on 2010-08-25 18:47 (UTC)
commented on 2010-08-24 23:47 (UTC)
commented on 2010-05-17 18:48 (UTC)
commented on 2010-05-12 09:07 (UTC)
scarecrow commented on 2010-05-12 09:03 (UTC)
commented on 2010-05-08 09:03 (UTC)
piojo commented on 2010-05-08 05:38 (UTC)