Package Details: foobar2000 2.1.6-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/foobar2000.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: foobar2000
Description: An advanced freeware audio player (uses Wine)
Upstream URL: https://www.foobar2000.org
Licenses: custom
Submitter: None
Maintainer: supermario
Last Packager: supermario
Votes: 67
Popularity: 0.028541
First Submitted: 2010-05-07 18:02 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-25 14:17 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »

craeckie commented on 2015-11-24 09:40 (UTC)

I'm getting this error in package(): unar: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.55: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory I tried downgrading lib32-icu to 55, but still got this error.

DaMoo commented on 2015-03-01 18:29 (UTC)

Flagging this as out-of-date, according to the homepage 1.3.7 has been out since 2014-01-14.

jakobw commented on 2015-01-09 18:14 (UTC)

Shouldn't this package depend on wine-mono?

kmicu commented on 2014-07-20 16:12 (UTC)

2014-07-16 foobar2000 v1.3.3 final has been released. http://www.foobar2000.org/changelog

gijs commented on 2014-06-02 20:59 (UTC)

Thank you for looking in to this. Unarchiver was not previously installed on my system, which did not result in a fail during build() before, but it did after installing and uninstalling unarchiver. It works fine now, even though the version of icu in /usr/lib is still v53.1 . For any of you interested: I use aurget for managing AUR packages. Regards, gijs

deimos commented on 2014-06-02 20:19 (UTC)

I am unable to replicate this error. Since the problem appears to be with the unarchiver build dependency, please rebuild/reinstall unarchiver and see if you still experience problems.

gijs commented on 2014-06-01 19:38 (UTC)

As Ruben below me mentions, install of the new foobar package fails because the icu version it is trying to link to (v52) does not match the current version Arch is using (v53.1). Symlinking /usr/lib/libicu*.so.52 to their up to date counterparts makes the install go through successfully, but might lead to unexpected results when running foobar. Could you please have a look at this? Thanks in advance.

RubenKelevra commented on 2014-05-25 13:29 (UTC)

==> Continue building foobar2000 ? [Y/n] ==> ------------------------------------ ==> ==> Building and installing package ==> Erstelle Paket: foobar2000 1.3.2-1 (So 25. Mai 15:28:30 CEST 2014) ==> Prüfe Laufzeit-Abhängigkeiten... ==> Prüfe Buildtime-Abhängigkeiten... ==> Empfange Quellen... -> Lade foobar2000_v1.3.2.exe herunter... % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed 100 3679k 100 3679k 0 0 574k 0 0:00:06 0:00:06 --:--:-- 812k -> LICENSE gefunden -> foobar2000.sh gefunden -> foobar2000.png gefunden -> foobar2000.desktop gefunden ==> Überprüfe Gültigkeit der Quell-Dateien mit md5sums... foobar2000_v1.3.2.exe ... Durchgelaufen LICENSE ... Durchgelaufen foobar2000.sh ... Durchgelaufen foobar2000.png ... Durchgelaufen foobar2000.desktop ... Durchgelaufen ==> Entpacke Quellen ... ==> Betrete fakeroot Umgebung... ==> Beginne package()... unar: error while loading shared libraries: libicuuc.so.52: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory ==> FEHLER: Ein Fehler geschah in package(). Breche ab ... ==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build foobar2000.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 Next › Last »