Package Details: freecad-appimage 0.21.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/freecad-appimage.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: freecad-appimage
Description: A general purpose 3D CAD modeler (AppImage version)
Upstream URL: https://www.freecad.org/
Licenses: LGPL
Conflicts: freecad
Provides: freecad
Submitter: igormp
Maintainer: SammysHP
Last Packager: SammysHP
Votes: 17
Popularity: 0.000001
First Submitted: 2019-01-04 10:42 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-01-09 18:36 (UTC)

Dependencies (1)

Required by (4)

Sources (3)

Pinned Comments

SammysHP commented on 2022-07-03 17:58 (UTC)

I'd like to keep this package as there are some minor differences to the community repo version regarding dependencies and features. If you're happy with the community repo version, there's no reason to use this. But it shouldn't hurt either. ;)

igormp commented on 2021-02-28 00:49 (UTC)

There's an official freecad build on Arch's official repo now: https://archlinux.org/packages/community/x86_64/freecad/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

barabas commented on 2019-08-25 12:51 (UTC)

Hi. I have no issues when running the AppImage. Both the version in this package and the most recent version from the website run with no issues. (FreeCAD_0.18-16131-Linux-Conda_Py3Qt5_glibc2.12-x86_64.AppImage)

According to this thread, 0.19 will fix the issue.

igormp commented on 2019-08-23 14:46 (UTC)

Hi guys, sorry for the long time to bring some feedback.

Unfortunately, it seems that the AppImage release of FreeCad isn't working properly, as reported by @nTia89 (you can check this by downloading the appimage itself and then trying to run it).

Since I don't know how to fix this, and I don't see the point in updating it to a broken version, I'll leave it as it is until it gets fixed.

nTia89 commented on 2019-08-11 19:27 (UTC) (edited on 2019-08-12 09:19 (UTC) by nTia89)

Freecad doesn't start; I get this error:

[mattia@arch-xps freecad-appimage]$ freecad 
/tmp/.mount_freecaRAJZq2
FreeCAD 0.18, Libs: 0.18R16117 (Git)
© Juergen Riegel, Werner Mayer, Yorik van Havre 2001-2019
  #####                 ####  ###   ####  
  #                    #      # #   #   # 
  #     ##  #### ####  #     #   #  #   # 
  ####  # # #  # #  #  #     #####  #   # 
  #     #   #### ####  #    #     # #   # 
  #     #   #    #     #    #     # #   #  ##  ##  ##
  #     #   #### ####   ### #     # ####   ##  ##  ##

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
/tmp/.mount_freecaRAJZq2/AppRun: line 12: 10815 Segmentation fault      (core dumped) ${HERE}/usr/bin/FreeCAD "$@"

EDIT: I tried both current PKGBUILD version and the one just released, and they suffer of the same issue...

barabas commented on 2019-05-25 15:15 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-25 15:17 (UTC) by barabas)

Can you add the fuse2 as a dependency? If you try to run without fuse2 it just prints this:

dlopen(): error loading libfuse.so.2

AppImages require FUSE to run. 
You might still be able to extract the contents of this AppImage 
if you run it with the --appimage-extract option. 
See https://github.com/AppImage/AppImageKit/wiki/FUSE 
for more information

igormp commented on 2019-05-24 02:11 (UTC)

I just updated it and skipped the checksum. Hope it works for you guys now.

wilriker commented on 2019-05-21 18:06 (UTC)

Sorry to come back again but I have no clue what GitHub is doing. Installed the latest package today. First attempt checksum failed. Removed the already downloaded appimage file. Redownloaded from GitHub then it worked. Just tried to install the same package on another machine. Again first attempt failed with wrong checksum. Removed downloaded appimage, redownloaded, failed again. GitHub seems to provide different files from different mirrors. Can you please remove the checksum check until the next release of FreeCAD?

igormp commented on 2019-05-19 20:41 (UTC)

@moj thanks for the heads up, I just updated the checksum

moj commented on 2019-05-19 20:24 (UTC)

I think the checksum in PKGBUILD is just wrong, I replaced it with the actual one (a6d886127dadc910f8e2f35a89922c9a77ca529defbf9a034bb2087b14bbb9cd) and it works

igormp commented on 2019-05-03 19:36 (UTC)

Ok, that's really weird. Maybe something going on with github? If you want, I could just skip the checksum for the AppImage file itself.

wilriker commented on 2019-05-03 19:15 (UTC)

Now that's strange because it worked with the checksums for me in 0.18_16110-2 and did/does not work in 0.18_16110-1 and 0.18_16110-3.

How can checksums be different on different machines?