Package Details: gittyup 1.4.0-5

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/gittyup.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: gittyup
Description: Graphical Git client (GitAhead fork)
Upstream URL: https://murmele.github.io/Gittyup
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: alerque
Maintainer: alerque
Last Packager: alerque
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.45
First Submitted: 2021-11-23 20:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-20 12:52 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

alerque commented on 2024-12-20 13:30 (UTC)

I've created an issue upstream to track requirements for this build to make it to [extra]. As soon as those are met I'll make an official build for this. The project is a lot closer than it was even the last time I reviewed the status. If you want this to happen I'm sure the upstream project could use a hand with a few of the remaining details for devendoring.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Next › Last »

roti commented on 2022-11-25 13:18 (UTC)

I still have to use yochananmarqos's PKGBUILD file to have a successfull build, without the 2 test errors.

denzil commented on 2022-11-01 09:34 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-01 09:35 (UTC) by denzil)

@alerque I got the same error, in fact I have 2 tests failed. You can see entire output here https://pastebin.com/fh29e9rV I checked, I don't have git-lfs package installed.

alerque commented on 2022-10-29 17:03 (UTC)

@SoftExpert That does not sound right at all. This does not require git-lfs to build, and indeed I've been building it in chroots without it installed. I only have it marked as an optional dependency. I doubt your system is missing anything because makepkg would warn you about not having any of the necessary dependencies, what I suspect is happening is you have something more than specified here that was causing an incorrectly configured build. It would be nice to know what that is but I don't see any clues yet (again partly because your log doesn't show the actual error).

SoftExpert commented on 2022-10-29 11:04 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-29 11:04 (UTC) by SoftExpert)

@alerque: I was missing git-lfs package; once I installed it, the package built correctly. Thank you !

alerque commented on 2022-10-29 07:38 (UTC)

@SoftExpert My tests building this in a clean chroot build environment pass the checks. Are you building on a host system with possibly other packages installed that it finds instead of the vendored submodules? Try building in a chroot with only the declared dependencies.

Your output doesn't show the part of the tests that actually failed, so I can't suggest much.

Also you can install the prebuilt package from my Arch user repository.

SoftExpert commented on 2022-10-28 22:58 (UTC) (edited on 2022-10-28 22:59 (UTC) by SoftExpert)

Build of the latest version (1.2.0-1) fails with:


      Start 18: Submodule
18/22 Test #18: Submodule ........................   Passed    7.03 sec
      Start 19: referencelist
19/22 Test #19: referencelist ....................   Passed    1.62 sec
      Start 20: amend
20/22 Test #20: amend ............................   Passed    2.44 sec
      Start 21: SshConfig
21/22 Test #21: SshConfig ........................   Passed    0.11 sec
      Start 22: fileContextMenu
22/22 Test #22: fileContextMenu ..................   Passed    9.55 sec

91% tests passed, 2 tests failed out of 22

Label Time Summary:
NO_WIN32_OFFSCREEN    =  13.98 sec*proc (4 tests)

Total Test time (real) =  89.63 sec

The following tests FAILED:
      7 - index (Failed)
     17 - TreeView (Failed)
Errors while running CTest
FAILED: test/CMakeFiles/check /var/tmp/pamac-build-username/gittyup/src/build/test/CMakeFiles/check 
cd /var/tmp/pamac-build-username/gittyup/src/build/test && /usr/bin/ctest --force-new-ctest-process --output-on-failure --timeout 300
ninja: build stopped: subcommand failed.
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in check().
    Aborting...

yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-25 23:31 (UTC)

@alerque: I would talk to upstream. I only created my PKGBUILD because I had nothing else to do. It's an interesting project, so I check when there's new releases. That's about it. I don't even use it. I gave up on git GUI's and just use terminal commands.

alerque commented on 2022-08-25 20:08 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos Any interest in PR's the differences needed for a bump to here. Clearly upstream hasn't gotten things together so this can be built without a bunch of vendored stuff so we'll have to go with it for now. If you have whatever new modules and minimal changes are required for and update I would roll with it (keeping in mind the style choices I've made are working towards a [community] build if we can get it sufficiently de-vendored).

yochananmarqos commented on 2022-08-13 19:27 (UTC)

@datejur: There's also a couple new submodules, see my PKGBUILD.

danejur commented on 2022-08-13 19:22 (UTC)

For anyone out of date as of 2022-08-12, applying patlefort's patch to the existing PKGBUILD (ver 1.1.1) and changing the pkgver on line 5 to 1.1.2 was all I needed to do to build and install the latest version.