Package Details: java8-openjfx-src 8.u202-10

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/java8-openjfx.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: java8-openjfx
Description: Java OpenJFX 8 client application platform (open-source implementation of JavaFX)
Upstream URL: https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Main
Keywords: java8-openjfx openjfx
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: freswa
Maintainer: Rogach
Last Packager: Rogach
Votes: 13
Popularity: 1.06
First Submitted: 2022-03-09 18:41 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-25 07:41 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »

Rogach commented on 2023-02-20 07:14 (UTC)

@moonbard Indeed the archive file changed. I've updated the PKGBUILD with the new checksum.

I looked into the archive - the files are still exactly the same, the only difference is that now tar attributes also contain the owner user name for all files ("root" everywhere).

moonbard commented on 2023-02-20 05:06 (UTC)

I have tried re-downloading several times, but consistently get a checksum error:

sha256sum 8u202-ga.tar.bz2 813ed6bbe7669b5acae7908720b9e353771e854be75c57a323310d0b9271daff 8u202-ga.tar.bz2

I'm a bit lost now and could use some help. I managed to get all the other dependencies, including python2.

gnaggnoyil commented on 2023-02-17 16:00 (UTC)

@Rogach I'm not sure what were the "whole log" you mentioned referring to. I've uploaded the whole output of my terminal after makepkg reports error, which is about ~150MB, alongside with the makepkg.conf file I'm using when I run makepkg. Hope it helps.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HT1EwBFstqBt6mkypBpRTVBUTVtLQbnM/view

Shalrath commented on 2023-02-12 17:22 (UTC)

@Rogach thank you, that worked. Seems to be a trizen problem then.

Rogach commented on 2023-02-12 14:19 (UTC)

@Shalrath Can you try running makepkg directly (instead of trizen), to check if the error stays the same?

Shalrath commented on 2023-02-12 02:25 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-12 04:55 (UTC) by Shalrath)

@Rogach I am using trizen to install AUR packages. For python2, I installed the package python2-bin from AUR as the python2 package does not install because a selftest fails. My python2 version is 2.7.18.

Rogach commented on 2023-02-11 14:38 (UTC)

@Shalrath Additional question - what's the version of Python 2 installed on your system? What's the output of pacman -Qs python2?

Rogach commented on 2023-02-11 14:35 (UTC)

@Shalrath I definitely have both python2 and python3 installed on my system, and I don't get this error (my system would cease working if python3 wasn't installed). Do you use makepkg for building or do you use some wrapper? Perhaps you are trying to build in chroot?

Shalrath commented on 2023-02-10 18:04 (UTC)

When both python2 and python3 are installed, this fails to build because it uses python3 and then complains "Python 2 is required, but Python 3 was found."

Rogach commented on 2023-02-07 13:17 (UTC)

@gnaggnoyil I think that's not what fails the build - -fpermissive flag actually allows the build to continue in presence of such errors. Can you post the whole log somewhere?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Next › Last »