Package Details: jdk 23.0.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/jdk.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: jdk
Description: Oracle Java Development Kit
Upstream URL: https://www.oracle.com/java/
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Conflicts: jre
Provides: java-environment, java-environment-jdk, java-runtime, java-runtime-headless, java-runtime-headless-jdk, java-runtime-jdk23, jdk23-jdk, jre, jre23-jdk, jre23-jdk-headless
Submitter: td123
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 1086
Popularity: 0.117008
First Submitted: 2011-08-27 17:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-16 14:08 (UTC)

Required by (2651)

Sources (9)

Pinned Comments

dbermond commented on 2024-03-19 19:54 (UTC)

  • Important notice:

As was made with the java packages in the official repositories, jdk now provides the jre alongside it, and both packages conflict with each other. During the package upgrade to version 22, act accordingly to your needs. For example, if you have both jdk and jre installed, only jdk will be sufficient, as it now also contains the runtime environment, and jre can be uninstalled. If you have only jre installed, no action is required.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 .. 81 Next › Last »

Det commented on 2017-09-21 22:15 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-24 06:29 (UTC) by Det)

Well, here's them Java 9. For What's New, see e.g.: - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/whatsnew/toc.htm#JSNEW-GUID-C23AFD78-C777-460B-8ACE-58BE5EA681F6 - http://blog.takipi.com/5-features-in-java-9-that-will-change-how-you-develop-software-and-2-that-wont/ - https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2017/09/java-9-and-intellij-idea/ To be noted tho, 32-bit support was dropped (even tho the exact same build for jre-devel has it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jre-devel/) (Upd: both sources gone missing): "JDK 8 and below offered a client JVM and a server JVM for Windows 32-bit systems with the default being the client JVM. JDK 9 will offer only the server JVM. The server JVM has better performance although it might require more resources. The change is made to reduce complexity and to benefit from the increased capabilities of computers." p.s. The versioning is for the same trick as with 8u0. Pacman wouldn't recognize e.g. 9 -> 9u5 as an update, but 9u0 -> 9u5 works fine.

Det commented on 2017-09-21 22:13 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-24 06:21 (UTC) by Det)

Well, here's them Java 9. For What's New, see e.g.: - https://docs.oracle.com/javase/9/whatsnew/toc.htm#JSNEW-GUID-C23AFD78-C777-460B-8ACE-58BE5EA681F6 - http://blog.takipi.com/5-features-in-java-9-that-will-change-how-you-develop-software-and-2-that-wont/ - https://blog.jetbrains.com/idea/2017/09/java-9-and-intellij-idea/ To be noted tho, 32-bit support was dropped (even tho the exact same build for jdk-devel has it: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/jdk-devel/ (Upd: Not no more)): "JDK 8 and below offered a client JVM and a server JVM for Windows 32-bit systems with the default being the client JVM. JDK 9 will offer only the server JVM. The server JVM has better performance although it might require more resources. The change is made to reduce complexity and to benefit from the increased capabilities of computers." p.s. The versioning is for the same trick as with 8u0. Pacman wouldn't recognize e.g. 9 -> 9u5 as an update, but 9u0 -> 9u5 works fine.

Marcel_K commented on 2017-09-09 16:51 (UTC)

Nope. Nice unicode graphics by the way. ;)

Det commented on 2017-09-09 16:42 (UTC)

That guy right there. Can't you see him? ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

Marcel_K commented on 2017-09-09 16:28 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-09 16:29 (UTC) by Marcel_K)

Det: who are you talking to?

Det commented on 2017-09-09 15:40 (UTC)

Cool homepage by the way.

Det commented on 2017-07-28 12:11 (UTC)

Fixed again. ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)

student975 commented on 2017-07-27 17:48 (UTC)

Have got again: ==> ERROR: Failure while downloading http://download.oracle.com/otn-pub/java/javafx/8.0.144-b14/090f390dda5b47b9b721c7dfaa008135/javafx-8u144-apidocs.zip

Det commented on 2017-07-19 09:04 (UTC)

Fixed.