This is completely broken for me using Wayland since last major changes in the PKGBUILD...
Search Criteria
Package Details: joplin 3.2.13-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | joplin |
Description: | A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities |
Upstream URL: | https://joplinapp.org/ |
Keywords: | markdown note notetaking productivity |
Licenses: | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
Conflicts: | joplin-appimage, joplin-beta, joplin-beta-appimage, joplin-electron |
Submitter: | masterkorp |
Maintainer: | dosenpils |
Last Packager: | dosenpils |
Votes: | 268 |
Popularity: | 4.61 |
First Submitted: | 2018-04-18 16:33 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-03-03 23:32 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- electron32 (electron32-binAUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR) (make)
- jq (jq-gitAUR, jaq-binAUR) (make)
- moreutils (moreutils-go-binAUR) (make)
- npm (corepackerAUR, python-nodejs-wheelAUR) (make)
- nvmAUR (nvm-gitAUR) (make)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR) (make)
- yarn (yarn-pnpm-corepackAUR, corepackerAUR, yarn-berryAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (3)
iyanmv commented on 2025-03-10 18:50 (UTC)
iyanmv commented on 2025-03-10 18:30 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-10 18:43 (UTC) by iyanmv)
dosenpils: Why did you decide to merge again joplin and joplin-desktop into a single package? I guess you should unpin the comments that are not relevant anymore. Also, I guess you should add joplin-desktop to the conflicts array, for people that installed it before.
bjo commented on 2025-03-05 10:40 (UTC)
Does it also build the mobile app which is not needed?
ild/joplin/src/joplin-3.2.13/packages/app-mobile/tools/../pluginAssets/mermaid/mermaid_render.js.base64.js"
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [@joplin/app-mobile]: [10:39:38] Finished 'encodeAssets' after 1.15 s
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [@joplin/app-mobile]: [10:39:38] Starting 'podInstall'...
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [@joplin/app-mobile]: [10:39:38] Finished 'podInstall' after 701 μs
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [@joplin/app-mobile]: [10:39:38] Finished 'build' after 4.63 min
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [@joplin/app-mobile]: Process exited (exit code 0), completed in 4m 46s
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: Done in 5m 30s
➤ YN0000: │ root@workspace:. STDOUT ➤ YN0000: [joplin]: Process started
bart commented on 2025-03-04 08:22 (UTC)
I just installed version 3.2.23-1 of the package and it installed the joplin-desktop application instead of the command line one. Is this on purpose? If so, that would we really disappointing...
tomacrisan commented on 2025-02-23 13:49 (UTC)
tomacrisan commented on 2025-02-23 13:43 (UTC)
I am able to build Joplin using the AUR joplin-beta PKGBUILD. It uses a specific version of nodejs. Here are two excerpts from the Joplin-beta PKGBUILD:
_electron=electron34
_node=18
source /usr/share/nvm/init-nvm.sh || [[ $? != 1 ]]
nvm install "${_node}"
nvm use "${_node}"
vandman commented on 2025-02-12 09:50 (UTC)
Hi, the change: - depends = nodejs>=20.15.0 + depends = nodejs-lts-iron breack the installation when you have nodejs installed. nodejs-lts-iron - 20.18.2-1 and nodejs - 23.7.0-1 are in conflict. Is there any reason why Joplin need a specific version? Regards Pierre
inverimus commented on 2025-02-11 02:13 (UTC)
I was able to update by downloading the pkgbuild and changing the dependencies to nodejs while using nvm to install and use lts/iron.
michaldybczak commented on 2025-02-10 15:53 (UTC)
Won't build because of missing dependency: nodejs-lts-iron. PKBUILD needs to be updated?
dosenpils commented on 2025-02-09 19:22 (UTC)
@tomacrisan
I'll have a look into the issue the upcoming week.
Pinned Comments
masterkorp commented on 2021-12-27 11:30 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-27 11:32 (UTC) by masterkorp)
Hello everyone,
There was been several difficulties upgrading the Joplin due to major changes in the build system upstream.
I have finnally got version 2.6.10 working with pacthes, but remenber:
You may need to remove your src/ folder before using this version
The patches are still not perfect, you must say yes to a prompt
I will continue working on this later today, but its usable and stable, please remenber you can always report issues on the github repository.
Regards, Alfredo Palhares
masterkorp commented on 2020-12-24 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-24 20:00 (UTC) by masterkorp)
Hello everyone,
I will be renaming the packages to its final form.
Also, please for problems with the package, please open an issue on the Github repo, its really hard to provide support on the comments section, you can also email me.
If you have problems with the
check()
function, just run makepkg with the--nocheck
flag.Thank you for your patience. Regards, Alfredo Palhares