Package Details: joplin-desktop 3.3.13-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: joplin
Description: A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities - Desktop
Upstream URL: https://joplinapp.org/
Keywords: markdown note notetaking productivity
Licenses: AGPL-3.0-or-later
Groups: joplin
Submitter: masterkorp
Maintainer: cuihao
Last Packager: cuihao
Votes: 270
Popularity: 0.65
First Submitted: 2018-04-18 16:33 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-24 03:13 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

cuihao commented on 2025-05-18 23:40 (UTC)

Thank you dosenpils and masterkorp for supporting the package.

I replaced the PKGBUILD with the version I wrote for the archlinuxcn repo. I will do my best to follow the latest nodejs and electron versions.

Please try to build in a clean chroot (i.e., with extra-x86_64-build from devtools package) if you have problems building the package.

dianqk commented on 2023-04-30 01:09 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-02 03:26 (UTC) by dianqk)

If you want to use the fcitx input method under wayland, please complete the following configuration:

cat .config/electron25-flags.conf 
--enable-wayland-ime
--ozone-platform=wayland

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 .. 61 Next › Last »

OdinVex commented on 2025-03-16 19:35 (UTC)

@tomacrisan, Thank you for the follow-up, same here. I guess I'll have to dive deeper.

tomacrisan commented on 2025-03-16 19:22 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-16 19:28 (UTC) by tomacrisan)

@OdinVex: Now when I type $ node -v, I receive the following:

$ node -v
v20.18.3

This is the correct version of nodejs-lts-iron.

Also, when I type $ which node, I receive:

$ which node
/usr/bin/node

Before I deleted the extraneous version of nodejs, I would receive:

$ which node
/usr/local/bin/node

This version was executing before the required installed version.

I manually deleted the components of the old nodejs I found under the /usr/local/bin, /usr/local/, /usr/local/include, and /usr/local/lib/node_modules/.

OdinVex commented on 2025-03-16 18:10 (UTC)

@tomacrisan, Could you provide more details? I'd like to make sure I don't have something messing my installation up. Mine compiles but just stays "connecting", times out after 2047 seconds. Meanwhile other devices (different OS) connect fine, same network, wondering if it's just my installation.

tomacrisan commented on 2025-03-16 18:04 (UTC)

@dosenpils: I want to report the cause to my problems with building joplin using your PKGBUILD and it was clearly my fault. I found that I had a version of nodejs from 2023 installed under /usr/local/ that was unknown to the package manager but was executing before the nodejs-lts-iron package that is installed under /usr/.

The reason the joplin-beta PKGBUILD would work for me is that it would install a copy of nodejs of the required version in the build directory.

Thanks for your work in providing Joplin for the Arch community and apologies for any of your time I might have wasted.

OdinVex commented on 2025-03-16 16:20 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-16 16:35 (UTC) by OdinVex)

Ever since 10b22a33a84bb603e76cfa2aebf5376fe8d2b561 I've not been able to connect to anything, unable to determine why either. Giving up. (Edit: Not saying it's this AUR or anything else, just mentioning the timing.) Edit: Fixed which commit.

rellieberman commented on 2025-03-13 13:25 (UTC)

not having the nodejs-lts-iorn dependency was good, some things on my system did not work well with it (only with the regular nodejs)

phonemic commented on 2025-03-13 13:20 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-13 13:22 (UTC) by phonemic)

I get the build error below. nodejs and nodejs-lts-iron conflict.

==> Missing dependencies:
  -> nodejs-lts-iron

dosenpils commented on 2025-03-12 23:17 (UTC)

Sorry for the inconvenience, I have reverted the last two changes.

iyanmv commented on 2025-03-10 18:50 (UTC)

This is completely broken for me using Wayland since last major changes in the PKGBUILD...

iyanmv commented on 2025-03-10 18:30 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-10 18:43 (UTC) by iyanmv)

dosenpils: Why did you decide to merge again joplin and joplin-desktop into a single package? I guess you should unpin the comments that are not relevant anymore. Also, I guess you should add joplin-desktop to the conflicts array, for people that installed it before.