Package Details: joplin 3.3.12-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/joplin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: joplin
Description: A note taking and to-do application with synchronization capabilities - CLI App
Upstream URL: https://joplinapp.org/
Keywords: markdown note notetaking productivity
Licenses: AGPL-3.0-or-later
Groups: joplin
Submitter: masterkorp
Maintainer: cuihao
Last Packager: cuihao
Votes: 267
Popularity: 1.12
First Submitted: 2018-04-18 16:33 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-05-20 01:38 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

cuihao commented on 2025-05-18 23:40 (UTC)

Thank you dosenpils and masterkorp for supporting the package.

I replaced the PKGBUILD with the version I wrote for the archlinuxcn repo. I will do my best to follow the latest nodejs and electron versions.

Please try to build in a clean chroot (i.e., with extra-x86_64-build from devtools package) if you have problems building the package.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 .. 59 Next › Last »

masterkorp commented on 2020-12-24 19:58 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-24 20:00 (UTC) by masterkorp)

Hello everyone,

I will be renaming the packages to its final form.

  • joplin will contain the CLI application
  • joplin-desktop will contain the Desktop version

Also, please for problems with the package, please open an issue on the Github repo, its really hard to provide support on the comments section, you can also email me.

If you have problems with the check() function, just run makepkg with the --nocheck flag.

Thank you for your patience. Regards, Alfredo Palhares

Entrust0398 commented on 2020-12-23 13:31 (UTC)

Thank you @paro

paro commented on 2020-12-23 13:21 (UTC)

I opened an issue on maintainer github (https://github.com/alfredopalhares/arch-pkgbuilds/issues/66) with various notes and comments. I'm fixing the pkgbuild and willing to share my solution if maintainer doesn't show up. For the time being, I'd suggest to simply compile the packages with makepkg and then install the joplin package alone (with pacman -U).

Entrust0398 commented on 2020-12-23 12:00 (UTC)

Hi all, I'm having problems with the current build I don't understand, hoping for some help. I first tried to update a few days ago and I got this error message:


joplin on  master [?]
➜  makepkg -si
==> WARNING: The package group has already been built, installing existing packages...
==> Installing joplin package group with pacman -U...
loading packages...
resolving dependencies...
looking for conflicting packages...
error: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: joplin and joplin-desktop-electron are in conflict
==> WARNING: Failed to install built package(s).
makepkg -si  6.68s user 2.74s system 109% cpu 8.598 total

I have tried uninstalling the previous packages and pulled the latest version each time one has become available over the past few days but to no avail. Any help would be greatly appreciated.

maciex commented on 2020-12-22 19:57 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-22 19:57 (UTC) by maciex)

Hello, I'm trying to install this package but i have:

rror: unresolvable package conflicts detected
error: failed to prepare transaction (conflicting dependencies)
:: joplin and joplin-desktop-electron are in conflict

I do not have joplin-desktop-electron installed.

greve commented on 2020-12-22 10:30 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-22 11:24 (UTC) by greve)

When starting joplin-desktop:

./@joplinapp-desktop: error while loading shared libraries: libicui18n.so.67: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

I cannot recall when the last time was it worked, I completely lost track of what is going on with this package ...

EDIT: (Re)Did yay -S --mflags="--nocheck" joplin and it works again.

phonemic commented on 2020-12-21 13:08 (UTC)

@masterkorp --nocheck is still needed for the build to succeed. I agree, it would be great if you could test locally then push one commit when ready.

figue commented on 2020-12-21 11:50 (UTC)

with "makepkg -f" you can force the build. No need to bump if not necessary. Is better to make changes locally and, at the end, push the update to AUR, as Rhinoceros suggest.

Rhinoceros commented on 2020-12-21 11:07 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-21 12:57 (UTC) by Rhinoceros)

@masterkorp Oh okay. Maybe I missed something. Can't you just makepkg locally without pushing changes? What else does the AUR do exactly?