Package Details: libselinux 3.9-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/libselinux.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: libselinux
Description: SELinux library and simple utilities
Upstream URL: https://github.com/SELinuxProject/selinux
Keywords: selinux
Licenses: custom
Groups: selinux
Conflicts: selinux-usr-libselinux
Provides: libselinux.so, selinux-usr-libselinux
Submitter: Siosm
Maintainer: matricaldefunkt (IooNag)
Last Packager: matricaldefunkt
Votes: 135
Popularity: 1.67
First Submitted: 2013-11-03 20:05 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-09-24 09:01 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

IooNag commented on 2025-09-29 08:31 (UTC)

ggnoredo: yes, there was a recent issue with libselinux, which I am currently fixing. I have just updated libsepol to version 3.9. If you encounter any issue, please report it on https://github.com/archlinuxhardened/selinux . Thanks!

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 9 Next › Last »

7cff commented on 2025-10-26 04:16 (UTC)

Heads up, there is a specific SPDX license identifier for libselinux (libselinux-1.0): https://spdx.org/licenses/libselinux-1.0.html

dreieck commented on 2025-09-29 10:50 (UTC)

The license identifier needs to be made SPDX compliant: 

libselinux E: custom is not a valid SPDX license identifier. See https://spdx.org/licenses/ for valid identifiers, or prefix the identifier with 'LicenseRef-', if it is custom.

Regards and thanks for the package!

IooNag commented on 2025-09-29 08:31 (UTC)

ggnoredo: yes, there was a recent issue with libselinux, which I am currently fixing. I have just updated libsepol to version 3.9. If you encounter any issue, please report it on https://github.com/archlinuxhardened/selinux . Thanks!

ggnoredo commented on 2025-09-29 06:23 (UTC)

maintainer broke something

 -> could not find all required packages: libsepol >=3.9
aur/libsepol 3.8-1 (+113 0.27) (Out-of-date: 2025-04-15) (Installed)

pcmoore commented on 2025-04-03 15:06 (UTC)

One call pull Petr's keys from GH using the following URL, which has the new key.

Here is what I see when I look at the downloaded key:

% gpg --show-keys ./bachradsusi.gpg 
pub   rsa4096 2012-04-03 [SC]
      E853C1848B0185CF42864DF363A8AD4B982C4373
uid                      Petr Lautrbach <plautrba@redhat.com>
sub   rsa4096 2017-12-05 [A]
sub   rsa4096 2017-12-05 [S]
sub   rsa4096 2012-04-03 [E]

pub   rsa4096 2022-10-26 [SC] [expired: 2024-10-25]
      B8682847764DF60DF52D992CBC3905F235179CF1
uid                      Petr Lautrbach <lautrbach@redhat.com>
sub   rsa4096 2022-10-26 [E] [expired: 2024-10-25]
sub   rsa4096 2022-10-26 [A] [expired: 2024-10-25]
sub   rsa4096 2022-10-26 [S] [expired: 2024-10-25]

gpg: WARNING: No valid encryption subkey left over.
pub   rsa4096 2024-11-04 [SC] [expires: 2026-11-04]
      68D21823342A13683AEB3E4EFB4C685B5DC1C13E
uid                      Petr Lautrbach <lautrbach@redhat.com>
sub   rsa4096 2024-11-04 [E] [expires: 2026-11-04]
sub   rsa4096 2024-11-04 [S] [expires: 2026-11-04]
sub   rsa4096 2024-11-04 [AR] [expires: 2026-11-04]

Thiger commented on 2025-04-03 14:04 (UTC) (edited on 2025-04-03 14:12 (UTC) by Thiger)

So what can we do now? Is this package orphaned?


$ sudo gpg --verify --auto-key-retrieve /var/cache/private/pamac/libselinux/libselinux-3.8.tar.gz.asc /var/cache/private/pamac/libselinux/libselinux-3.8.tar.gz
gpg: Signature made Mi 29 Jan 2025 18:57:17 CET
gpg:                using RSA key 7200EB2C3F5E488463C0CE9ECDCAE8C927C6BE31
gpg: Good signature from "Petr Lautrbach <lautrbach@redhat.com>" [unknown]
gpg: WARNING: This key is not certified with a trusted signature!
gpg:          There is no indication that the signature belongs to the owner.
Primary key fingerprint: 68D2 1823 342A 1368 3AEB  3E4E FB4C 685B 5DC1 C13E
     Subkey fingerprint: 7200 EB2C 3F5E 4884 63C0  CE9E CDCA E8C9 27C6 BE31

sebvdk commented on 2025-03-20 08:03 (UTC)

Hello,

Petr Lautrbach's gpg key is no longer valid

'68D21823342A13683AEB3E4EFB4C685B5DC1C13E' # Petr Lautrbach lautrbach@redhat.com

ninetailedtori commented on 2025-03-03 01:02 (UTC)

This may just be a case of Petr forgetting to refresh his keys to the keyserver. For now I'm going to ignore the package.

flberger commented on 2025-01-22 21:13 (UTC)

Trying to upgrade from 3.7-1 to 3.7-2 using pikaur, I get the error:

Verifying source file signatures with gpg... libselinux-3.7.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 4695881C254508D1)

Indeed the .tar.gz is signed with key 1BE2C0FF08949623102FD2564695881C254508D1 in .tar.gz.asc. PKGBUILD lists validpgpkeys = 63191CE94183098689CAB8DB7EF137EC935B0EAF (Jason Zaman perfinion@gentoo.org) and B8682847764DF60DF52D992CBC3905F235179CF1 (Petr Lautrbach plautrba@redhat.com).

I am very hesistant to install a package with an unknown public key. Any ideas how to fix this?

IooNag commented on 2024-12-29 14:08 (UTC)

Hello, I am currently on holidays with limited Internet connectivity. I saw your message but will probably only be able to work on it from Monday January, 6th.

By the way, I successfully built libselinux in the GitHub Actions CI 2 weeks ago (https://github.com/archlinuxhardened/selinux/actions/runs/12337081682/job/34430332766) and swig has recently been updated to 4.3.0-1 since then (https://archlinux.org/packages/extra/x86_64/swig/). The build issue could probably also be fixed by (temporarily) downgrading swig.

1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 9 Next › Last »