Would it be possible to add the module drivetemp
?
Search Criteria
Package Details: linux-amd-znver3-headers 6.8.v.8-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-amd-znver3.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | linux-amd-znver3 |
Description: | Header files and scripts for building modules for the linux-amd-znver3 kernel |
Upstream URL: | https://www.kernel.org/ |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | eggz |
Maintainer: | eggz |
Last Packager: | eggz |
Votes: | 10 |
Popularity: | 1.04 |
First Submitted: | 2023-05-04 15:47 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-04-27 16:36 (UTC) |
Dependencies (9)
- bc (bc-ghAUR) (make)
- docbook-xsl (make)
- gcc (gccrs-gitAUR, gcc11AUR, gcc-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR) (make)
- inetutils (inetutils-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- kmod (kmod-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR) (make)
- libelf (elfutils-gitAUR) (make)
- lzop (make)
- xmlto (xmlto-gitAUR) (make)
Required by (0)
Sources (3)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next › Last »
yamai commented on 2024-01-11 00:25 (UTC)
eggz commented on 2024-01-02 06:54 (UTC)
I mean, yeah, you're right, it isn't a big diffrence. Infact, most things I do in these kernels dont really make that big of a diffrence (mtune, disable undeeded mods,...). It depends where you draw the line.
But in my timed tests lzo4 was actually faster in zstd, maybe it was a fluke, because I also saw tests that showed bigger performance with zstd. It's just not what I saw on my system.
onurmercury commented on 2024-01-01 21:55 (UTC)
well, i don't really expect to see big differences between decompression times of initrds (except xz) for any znver3 system anyway.
and i know this test doesn't really matter (because conditions aren't same with kernel boot factors) but zstd decompresses faster than others in userspace.
i want to test this someday with kernel boot-time decompression & non-kvm qemu system to see real results.
eggz commented on 2024-01-01 20:03 (UTC)
Im sorry but im really not impressed by zstd reading performance. I know you would rather keep everything compliant and generic, but at that point, I would really just advice you to use the vanilla arch kernel instead of this one ;-)
onurmercury commented on 2024-01-01 19:50 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-01 19:52 (UTC) by onurmercury)
ofc it's all up to you and not so big deal but i think forcing lzop via .preset is not ideal. it just takes away the global compression control of mkinicpio.conf
.
Mario156090 commented on 2024-01-01 19:40 (UTC)
Aparently only were a installation problem because now works perfectly.
[mario@asus-arch ~]$ uname -r 6.6.9-AMD-znver3 [mario@asus-arch ~]$ ^C [mario@asus-arch ~]$
eggz commented on 2024-01-01 19:37 (UTC)
@mario good to hear because I was all out of ideas..
Mario156090 commented on 2024-01-01 19:36 (UTC)
Well, after reinstall it's booted correctly.
eggz commented on 2024-01-01 19:19 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-01 19:20 (UTC) by eggz)
I will keep the preset file since it forces lzop compression, which is sometimes faster than zstd, especially in reading ==> (just like I do in the internal kernel)
CONFIG_KERNEL_LZO=y
these kernels were using lzop far before the arch kernels switched to zstd, and I havent been convinced by their performance after some testing to do some switching myself.
The other two are indeed interesting (although the move of the systemmap to headers seems a bit trivial to me), ill have a look at it soon.
onurmercury commented on 2024-01-01 19:12 (UTC)
yep i don't have any problems with 6.6.9 update. it works like a charm.
Pinned Comments
eggz commented on 2023-05-07 09:41 (UTC)
Tired of compiling? Use this binary repo instead! Add this at the end of /etc/pacman.conf :