Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.90
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2016-10-06 08:58 (UTC)

What patches are you referring to?

zerophase commented on 2016-10-06 03:15 (UTC)

Anyone know if the Linux-nvme kernel patches have any issues with ck? Going to be picking up an nvme drive in a couple week and just want to check if anyone knows of any issues.

graysky commented on 2016-10-05 18:09 (UTC)

@Pedrogabriel - Yes, if you enable the build option. I just updated 4.7.6-1 to pull in MuQSS v106 (disabled by default).

pedrogabriel commented on 2016-10-05 15:45 (UTC)

Does MuQSS 106 apply to 4.7?

graysky commented on 2016-10-04 22:12 (UTC)

105 is out but it's jacked up and does not cleanly apply to either 4.7 or 4.8. See CK's latest blog. I have unflagged; please flag again when the 105 is updated.

pedrogabriel commented on 2016-10-04 22:00 (UTC)

MuQSS 105 is out now.

pedrogabriel commented on 2016-10-04 13:27 (UTC)

The kernel don't recognize my fans after compile it with MuQSS.

graysky commented on 2016-10-03 18:36 (UTC) (edited on 2016-10-03 20:08 (UTC) by graysky)

@vishwin - Sorry, but not out of date until BFQ for 4.8 is released. I do not see MuQSS104 that patches against the 4.7 code-base (although CK is working on 105 as we speak)... plus, 4.8-ARCH is probably still in the works as it hasn't been build nor hit [testing] just yet.

artafinde commented on 2016-10-03 13:45 (UTC) (edited on 2016-10-03 13:48 (UTC) by artafinde)

I actually won't be enabling this unless it turns out to be stable enough and give something to the <= 8 CPUs. I've enabled it on my laptop and screwed up the BTRFS ctree. Seems like I'm reformatting today. I can't really blame MuQSS since there's a big WARNING on top, but it's a warning to users here. Could be something else but all started after I compiled and booted the MuQSS enabled kernel. The combination was: CPU Haswell, BTRFS single metadata SSD 1 device, BFQ enabled by default, localmodules enabled and MuQSS.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 .. 307 Next › Last »