Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.88
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2016-07-27 21:01 (UTC) (edited on 2016-07-27 21:01 (UTC) by graysky)

Bump to v4.6.5-2 Changelog: 4.6.5-1 neglected to apply one of the BFQ patches; 4.6.5-2 fixes it (thanks to Lucjan Lucjanov for pointing this out). Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-07-27 18:21 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.5-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.5 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-07-11 21:57 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.4-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.4 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

graysky commented on 2016-06-25 15:33 (UTC)

Bump to v4.6.3-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v4.x/ChangeLog-4.6.3 Commit: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog LinuxChanges: http://kernelnewbies.org/Linux_4.6 Paolo has assured me that BFQ v7 is fine for the 4.6.x series of kernels; the bug that is affecting it applies equally to 4.5.x kernel users so there is no harm in including it against the 4.6.x series. He is testing prev8 of BFQ now but would not predict a release date. Enjoy the 4.6 series.

artafinde commented on 2016-06-20 19:52 (UTC)

That's fine and I agree - just mentioned my findings (though if I knew about the g-groups I'd already know that :D ). Probably the wait will be worth it with the new BFQ v8 [https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bfq-iosched/ReUuq4jtZ84]

graysky commented on 2016-06-20 19:32 (UTC)

Paolo has a testing version of BFQ for 4.6 but it and the 4.5 series have problems with hierarchical support[1]. We have 4,000+ [repo-ck] users so I would rather wait fo the ink to dry on the BFQ 4.6-final version before including old or testing patches. 1. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/bfq-iosched/7gJMK1DttYQ

artafinde commented on 2016-06-20 07:55 (UTC)

Interestingly the patches of BFQ 4.5 apply successfully on 4.6.2. Although I haven't test those as I don't use BFQ.

graysky commented on 2016-06-08 21:03 (UTC)

@dlh - Not of of date... see the comments from 2016-06-08

graysky commented on 2016-06-08 14:50 (UTC)

@PieGuy128 - Not out of date... see the comments from 2016-06-08

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 .. 307 Next › Last »