Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.88
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 .. 307 Next › Last »

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-08 12:08 (UTC)

==> Verifying source file signatures with gpg... linux-3.19.tar ... Passed patch-3.19.1 ... Passed ==> Entering fakeroot environment... ==> Creating source package... -> Adding PKGBUILD... -> Generating .SRCINFO file... -> Adding config.x86_64... -> Adding config... -> Adding linux-ck.preset... -> Adding change-default-console-loglevel.patch... -> Adding install file (linux-ck.install)... -> Compressing source package... ==> Leaving fakeroot environment. ==> Source package created: linux-ck (Sun Mar 8 13:07:38 CET 2015)

sir_lucjan commented on 2015-03-08 11:52 (UTC)

@milan385 You're wrong. http://allanmcrae.com/2015/01/two-pgp-keyrings-for-package-management-in-arch-linux/ and https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Makepkg#Signature_checking

graysky commented on 2015-03-08 11:29 (UTC)

Grrr... sorry about that. I refreshed the PKGBUILD for the correct checksum. The issue was that it was in fact correct, but at that time I didn't push the local copy to the repo. I then manually did so when pedrogabriel posted but the sum in the PKGBUILD was reindex against the old version. Anyway, it's right now.

clfarron4 commented on 2015-03-08 11:01 (UTC)

@DaMoo @milan385: Have you downloaded the GCC patch fresh? It was updated to reflect the addition of the Silvermont family of processors.

DaMoo commented on 2015-03-08 01:29 (UTC)

I'm having an issue where a patch is failing to pass a sha256 integrity check. Here's the output from my AUR helper: ==> Validating source files with sha256sums... linux-3.19.tar.xz ... Passed linux-3.19.tar.sign ... Skipped patch-3.19.1.xz ... Passed patch-3.19.1.sign ... Skipped patch-3.19-ck1.xz ... Passed enable_additional_cpu_optimizations_for_gcc_v4.9+_kernel_v3.15+.patch.gz ... FAILED config.x86_64 ... Passed config ... Passed linux-ck.preset ... Passed change-default-console-loglevel.patch ... Passed 0001-block-cgroups-kconfig-build-bits-for-BFQ-v7r7-3.19.patch ... Passed 0002-block-introduce-the-BFQ-v7r7-I-O-sched-for-3.19.patch ... Passed 0003-block-bfq-add-Early-Queue-Merge-EQM-to-BFQ-v7r7-for-3.19.0.patch ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check! :: failed to verify linux-ck integrity

graysky commented on 2015-03-07 16:25 (UTC)

Bump to v3.19.1-1 Comments: This release includes an updated gcc patch which allows for the optimization Silvermont processors. Changelog: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck/Changelog

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 .. 307 Next › Last »