Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.86
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2013-08-30 07:42 (UTC)

@liubenyuan - Is it the same problem described here[1]? Are you booting with BFQ enabled? What if you disable it? Paolo will need to know if his new patch does not fix the problem. 1. https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=168583

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-08-30 07:38 (UTC)

@graysky anyway, i failed to boot 3.10.10-1 and I am waiting for your magic update like 3.10.8 -> 3.10.9 :) And one problem I need report is that once I upgrade to 3.10.9, the system suffers with random lockup and a hard reset must be done.

graysky commented on 2013-08-30 07:14 (UTC)

@liubenyuan - Not according to Paolo: On 08/28/2013 03:33 AM, Paolo Valente wrote: > I'm not sure I fully understood your question, anyway: > to add BFQ-v6r2 to a 3.10.8+ kernel from scratch, the patchset [1] is all you need > > I hope this addresses your issue, > Paolo > > Il giorno 27/ago/2013, alle ore 21:04, member graysky ha scritto: > >> > Hi Paolo. I see you posted some new BFQ code[1]. Tell me, are these considered "stable?" Also, I noticed that I can still patch the included one from that google group link on top of these 3 you posted. Doesn't that mean that your patches are different from the one there? Should I still patch your 3 plus the one by Arianna Avanzini[2]? >> > >> > 1. http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/patches/3.10.8+-v6r2/ >> > 2. https://groups.google.com/group/bfq-iosched/attach/46d6e501b377bdef/0001-block-Switch-from-BFQ-v6r2-for-3.10.0-to-BFQ-v6r2-fo.patch?part=4&authuser=1&view=1 >> >

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-08-30 05:51 (UTC)

@graysky do we still need the following patch ? 1. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/bfq-iosched/f4Lg5INzQ-k/EFbHNzfjFTsJ 'cause my box failed to boot after upgrading to 3.10.10-1

graysky commented on 2013-08-29 20:25 (UTC)

Bump to v3.10.10-1 Changelog: https://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.x/ChangeLog-3.10.10 and updated BFQ patchset Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/linux-ck?id=dacf417b9f9fafee7493fcc1bb03e691633c9dd6

Gringo commented on 2013-08-22 13:04 (UTC)

Thanks for the quick update. I had the same hard lockup at boot, which forced me to move back to the vanilla kernel. linux-ck 3.10.9 works like charm however!

MarisaDOOM commented on 2013-08-21 22:48 (UTC)

Oh, I'll be taking that patch too, then...

graysky commented on 2013-08-21 22:21 (UTC)

Bump to v3.10.9-1 Changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/8/20/677 and added patch for BFQ[1] Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/linux-ck?id=ff178cde2a2adc84e515dae379dc45322b4b5941 1. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!msg/bfq-iosched/f4Lg5INzQ-k/EFbHNzfjFTsJ

runnytu commented on 2013-08-21 17:00 (UTC)

With the patch works ok, i'm running 3.10.9-ck ok.

graysky commented on 2013-08-21 16:49 (UTC)

I will look into that BFQ patch when I are lease 3.10.9-1 later this afternoon, my understanding through reading anecdotal reports is that indeed, BFQ and 3.10.8 do not play well together. PS sorry about the multiple posts. Posting from a phone sucks,

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 .. 307 Next › Last »