Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.86
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2013-05-08 20:07 (UTC)

@Andre - I see. I can tell you that the nvidia-304xx and virtualbox modules do not show anything bad in my dmesg; both of these have not been compiled against 3.8.12. I did have to rebuild the broadcom-wl-ck module however.

andre.vmatos commented on 2013-05-08 20:01 (UTC)

Hmm, IMHO, I think he means that 3rd-part modules (e.g. virtualbox) compiled for 3.8 series are showing errors, often symbol errors, upon insertion, avoiding it to load properly in 3.8.12, even when a compilation for 3.8 series are supposed to be binary-compatible with all 3.8 series (symbols and binary compatibility should change only in major (3.x) upgrades, requiring a recompilation or even patching).

graysky commented on 2013-05-08 20:00 (UTC)

Meant to post this link to the pre-release of 3.9.1-ck which is nearly 100 %. It is just missing the official yet-to-be-released BFQ which Paolo tells me should not be different from the current release which patches into 3.9 just fine. http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/linux-ck-next/linux-ck-3.9.1-0.src.tar.gz

graysky commented on 2013-05-08 19:55 (UTC)

Thanks for that link, andre. I guess I do not know what tpowa meant by his comment, "module breaker." https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-May/024896.html

andre.vmatos commented on 2013-05-08 19:46 (UTC)

This warnings isn't related with binary modules in 3.8.12, but with mkinitcpio 0.14: https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-dev-public/2013-May/024864.html

graysky commented on 2013-05-08 19:27 (UTC)

Bump to v3.8.12-1 Changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/5/8/12 Commit: Notes: Tpowa noted that the 3.8.12 release is a "binary module breaker" which I assume explains the mkinitcpio output when it built my fallback image: ==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: aic94xx ==> WARNING: Possibly missing firmware for module: bfa Dunno the scope of this and how it will affect users.

graysky commented on 2013-05-07 19:14 (UTC)

OK. The ck1 patchset for 3.9 has gone gold. We are just waiting for Paolo to do the same with the BFQ set and are on track for a release any time now. For those who can't wait: http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/linux-ck-next/linux-ck-3.9-0.src.tar.gz

Det commented on 2013-05-04 20:59 (UTC)

@Kalrish, was it fair for kernel.org to be attacked :)?

graysky commented on 2013-05-03 19:30 (UTC)

CK has released an rc quality patch featuring v0.430 of BFS[1]. I am running it here and wanted to give folks the chance to tinker with it as well: http://repo-ck.com/PKG_source/linux-ck-next/linux-ck-3.9-0.src.tar.gz Notes: 1) This is a pre-release so only download and compile the source if you accept that fact. 2) There is no BFQ yet, since Paolo has yet to release an updated patch. The old version of BFQ actually patches into the 3.9 tree without errors, but I do not want to run it until I hear back from him as to whether it is safe. 3) If you run this and find problems or you run this and find that it works just fine, please consider giving CK some feedback on the his blog I linked. 1. http://ck-hack.blogspot.com/2013/03/bfs-0428-for-linux-38x.html

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 .. 307 Next › Last »