Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.86
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 .. 307 Next › Last »

kyak commented on 2013-01-12 12:54 (UTC)

@graysky thanks a lot, very much appreciated!

graysky commented on 2013-01-12 12:41 (UTC)

@kyak - Correct. I am building up 3.7.2-2 right now. Even on my cluster, it take about 7 min per package. As you know, there are 25 packages across i686/x86_64 and all the cpu flavors to build. Should be online in 2-3 h from now.

kyak commented on 2013-01-12 12:33 (UTC)

@graysky it seems that repo-ck hasn't got latest updates. I'm still on 3.7.1-3-ck and pacman reports "repo-ck" repo as up to date.

graysky commented on 2013-01-12 11:53 (UTC)

Bump to v3.7.2-2 Changelog: Sync'ed up with ARCH pacakge, add CONFIG_ARPD, add CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG and fix GPU hang. Commit: --- pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git is down ---

graysky commented on 2013-01-11 20:31 (UTC)

Bump to v3.7.2-1 Changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/1/11/361 Commit:

qpalz commented on 2013-01-04 14:59 (UTC)

@cbowman57 OK, I will make them separate.

cbowman57 commented on 2013-01-04 14:58 (UTC)

I say keep it clean qpalz.

qpalz commented on 2013-01-04 06:31 (UTC)

@graysky I have tried making linux-uksm-ck be able to disable uksm and become linux-ck, but in a very ugly way since if you disable ck or uksm, the kernel suffix remains -uksm-ck. I can only fix this problem in a very ugly way, so I would rather not to use a extremely ugly method to solve a ugly problem. The extremely ugly method is to modify linux-uksm-ck.install linux-uksm-ck.preset dynamically when makepkg is running. But it results in the wrong checksum when you want to rebuild the package. Then a more more more ugly method can be used, that is to change the checksum dynamically... So, is it better not to merge them? What do you think?

<deleted-account> commented on 2013-01-03 14:13 (UTC)

@graysky,thanks.i see.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 .. 307 Next › Last »