Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.7-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.31
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-09 16:45 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2012-05-11 07:37 (UTC)

Because the packager is sloppy... thanks for pointing that out/fixed.

karabaja4 commented on 2012-05-11 07:14 (UTC)

Um... why is UKSM patch enabled by default?

graysky commented on 2012-05-10 14:38 (UTC)

@qcts33 - No need. That flag will make the needed changes to the config for you: sed -i -e '/CONFIG_DEFAULT_IOSCHED/ s,cfq,bfq,' -i -e s'/CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ=y/# CONFIG_DEFAULT_CFQ is not set\nCONFIG_DEFAULT_BFQ=y/' ./.config You can verify which is your default with this command: # cat /sys/block/sda/queue/scheduler noop deadline cfq [bfq]

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-05-10 14:34 (UTC)

I want to know if I set _BFQ_enable_="y" and compile the package from source, do I need to add "elevator=bfq" in /etc/default/grub like they said in wiki?

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 19:08 (UTC)

@dkay - no idea on performance benefit. I don't think performance is the goal; more free memory is the goal as I understand it. I don't think the CPU scheduler matters.

skydrome commented on 2012-05-09 15:45 (UTC)

@ryak - Yes, echo [0|1] > /sys/kernel/mm/uksm/run to turn off/on respectively

dkaylor commented on 2012-05-09 12:56 (UTC)

@graysky - regarding the current state of uksm patches, what's your take on any performance benefit at all, especially when compilied in with BFS? @xianai - any thoughts on the above? Do you still have plans for mainlining, or are you resigned to the BFS/BFQ route?

graysky commented on 2012-05-09 09:20 (UTC)

No possible. Needs to be compiled into the kernel at this point as far as I can tell. If you want that code, you'll have to compile from the AUR.

kyak commented on 2012-05-09 08:04 (UTC)

Do you guys know if it is possible to activate uksm from userland (or at least from kernel command line)? I'm asking because i'm using repo-ck kernel (so i can't enable uksm at build time) and uksm is definitely lacking documentation (in English, at least) - so i can't any information.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 .. 307 Next › Last »