Package Details: linux-ck 6.11.7-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.30
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-09 16:45 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2012-03-13 13:26 (UTC)

@Alucryd - dunno... never used yaourt. Pacman needs that for its dependency checks.

alucryd commented on 2012-03-13 13:15 (UTC)

So, makepkg or yaourt (or anything else) won't see this as linux-ck version 3.2.10, only linux-ck, unless you put this line. I didn't know about that, thx for the answer!

graysky commented on 2012-03-13 12:13 (UTC)

@Alucryd - it doesn't provide linux-ck, it provides linux-ck=${pkgver} which is a version-bound "linux-ck-3.2.10" in this case. Why? Other packages may have a version bound requirement for linux-ck, for example, nvidia-ck or broadcom-wl-ck, or lirc-ck that all require linux-ck<3.3 and linux-ck>=3.2 in order to work. That's why it's in there.

alucryd commented on 2012-03-13 09:24 (UTC)

Hey, I'm wondering: why put a provides line with linux-ck=... rather than linux=... when it is already the package name? I'm not criticizing, just trying to learn^^ (I had to change it to linux since catalyst-total, for example, wants linux, but it's true I could have switched linux with linux-ck in the catalyst PKGBUILD).

graysky commented on 2012-03-12 23:55 (UTC)

Bump to v3.2.10-1 Changelog: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/12/414 PKG Commit: http://pkgbuild.com/git/aur-mirror.git/commit/linux-ck?id=6db3faa3326725d28de38856453ce9532bcca595 General notes: For some reason the nvidia-ck and broadcom-wl-ck packages WILL need to be rebuilt against 3.2.10-1 (as was the case for 3.2.8 and 3.2.9). Rebuild this package first, then either or both of the two. Enjoy!

Zucca commented on 2012-03-12 21:22 (UTC)

Why just when I'm about to complie linux-ck, it's flagged ood.

p-w commented on 2012-03-03 18:19 (UTC)

Is anyone else having problems with the b34 driver in 3.2.9? My wireless card refuses to associate with the access point but works fine with 3.2.8. As far as I can see the firmware is loading fine so I'm stumped....

V3n3RiX commented on 2012-03-02 11:28 (UTC)

@Zom Thanks! Updated to 3.0.23 and now compiling. @graysky I lack time to maintain it.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 .. 307 Next › Last »