Package Details: linux-ck 6.9.6-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.30
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-21 18:26 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 .. 307 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2011-09-22 19:51 (UTC)

@lynix - I put an announcement in the forum thread and as well on the wiki, but you are correct, the URL users need to place in /etc/pacman.conf for the repo is now: [repo-ck] Server = http://repo-ck.com/$arch

lynix commented on 2011-09-22 13:13 (UTC)

Thanks, graysky! :) Just for those (like me) that wonder why there is no update in the repo: new url ^^

graysky commented on 2011-09-21 23:57 (UTC)

@justin - Thanks. Updated to 3.0.4-2 which includes the live code for BFQ. PKG built for me just fine. Enjoy you CK junkies!

justin.kueser commented on 2011-09-21 00:06 (UTC)

new bfq http://algo.ing.unimo.it/people/paolo/disk_sched/descr-of-new-versions/bfq-v3-features.php

graysky commented on 2011-09-18 00:52 (UTC)

Good idea, karabaja. Done but didn't bump the pkgver.

karabaja4 commented on 2011-09-17 22:46 (UTC)

graysky, could you temporarily replace: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ with http://kernelorg.mirrors.tds.net/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/ and http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/ with http://kernelorg.mirrors.tds.net/pub/linux/kernel/people/ck/patches/ because kernel.org has been down for quite a while now... :/

Zom commented on 2011-09-14 17:15 (UTC)

Actually, I'm going to apologise for my last comment. This doesn't have to drop down to flinging insults. Let's just try to keep discussion relevant to this package though.

Det commented on 2011-09-14 15:55 (UTC)

@Zom, yeah, because I was like going to discuss the weather next. Good thing you got here first.

Zom commented on 2011-09-14 14:17 (UTC)

You guys could just take it over email or, you know, the comments section of that package instead.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 .. 307 Next › Last »