Package Details: linux-ck 6.11-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-ck.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-ck
Description: The Linux kernel and modules with ck's hrtimer patches
Upstream URL: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Linux-ck
Licenses: GPL-2.0-only
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Replaces: virtualbox-guest-modules-arch, wireguard-arch
Submitter: graysky
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 459
Popularity: 0.92
First Submitted: 2011-07-22 14:51 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-09-19 13:04 (UTC)

Dependencies (14)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 .. 307 Next › Last »

Dennis commented on 2018-03-24 07:14 (UTC)

Today receiving the key just worked and the packages updated as well without issues. Must have been a network issue elsewhere.

@vp1981: The missing sudo on the second command was just an oversight on my part when I prepared a cleaned up, condensed message for posting here. In reality I ran all commands in a root shell and only added sudo in front for the log here to make it clear that I was running those commands as root.

vp1981 commented on 2018-03-23 23:55 (UTC)

@graysky

I already installed that packages using 'pacman -U'. I had to say that these are the only packages that not upgraded smoothly, on other two platforms (haswell and sandybridge) all was fine. At first I suspected that it is the 'archlinux-keyring' that cause the problem, I tried to update all other packages but without '-ck-skylake*' and only after that tried to update these two packages using usual 'pacman -Su' but 'pacman' reported something about either broken package or a key, I couldn't remember the details, sorry.

@Dennis

I tried to reinstall the key and went fine (actually pacman-key returned that the key is already installed). Besides, according to the your message the problem with 'gpg': it cannot retrieve the key. You may try again but I'm not sure what causes the failure (may be network problem or gpg misconfiguration, you may want to [re]read https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Pacman/Package_signing). Also I noticed that you issue command like

sudo pacman-key ... && pacman-key ...

without 'sudo' before the second pacman-key. Try to append 'sudo' to both 'pacman-key'.

P.S. I usually do that everyday:

(reflector stuff) && pacman -Scc && pacman -Syy && pacman -Su && pacman -Scc

Dennis commented on 2018-03-23 19:22 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-23 19:22 (UTC) by Dennis)

I'm also having problems updated linux-ck-skylake from repo-ck:

$ sudo pacman -Syyu

:: Starting full system upgrade... resolving dependencies... looking for conflicting packages...

Packages (2) linux-ck-skylake-4.15.12-1 linux-ck-skylake-headers-4.15.12-1

Total Installed Size: 152.68 MiB Net Upgrade Size: 0.05 MiB

:: Proceed with installation? [Y/n] Y (2/2) checking keys in keyring [#######################################################################################] 100% downloading required keys... error: key "88A032865EE46C4C" could not be looked up remotely error: required key missing from keyring error: failed to commit transaction (unexpected error) Errors occurred, no packages were upgraded.

$ sudo pacman-key -r 5EE46C4C && pacman-key --lsign-key 5EE46C4C gpg: keyserver receive failed: Address family not supported by protocol ==> ERROR: Remote key not fetched correctly from keyserver.

Also tried updating archlinux-keyring alone first and reinitialized and repopulated the keyring but I am still getting above errors.

graysky commented on 2018-03-23 18:54 (UTC)

@vp1981 and @Silvermight - Please pacman -Syyu and it should work.

vp1981 commented on 2018-03-23 14:35 (UTC)

@SilverMight: same here, I checked downloaded files (-ck-skylake and -ck-skylake-headers) and they are correct and 'pacman -U' installs them fine.

SilverMight commented on 2018-03-23 10:37 (UTC)

Getting error: linux-ck-skylake: missing required signature when trying to update from repo-ck.com... I have the pacman key added and I tried it again, however it still fails to update

sir_lucjan commented on 2018-03-22 10:30 (UTC)

@shanti

See:

https://github.com/sirlucjan/lucjan-kernels/blob/master/lucjan-kernels-experimental/v4.15/linux-bfq-sq-mq-haswell/PKGBUILD#L137

Works fine.

shanti commented on 2018-03-22 09:12 (UTC)

@sir_lucjan

thanks I added the lines you provided however I am still unable to apply the bfq-sq-mq patch successfully,

Makefile.rej gives:

[code]--- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION = NAME = Fearless Coyote

DOCUMENTATION --- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION =-mq NAME = Fearless Coyote
DOCUMENTATION[/code]

shanti commented on 2018-03-22 09:07 (UTC)

@sir_lucjan

thanks I added the lines you provided however I am still unable to apply the bfq-sq-mq patch successfully,

Makefile.rej gives:

[--- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION = NAME = Fearless Coyote

# DOCUMENTATION --- Makefile +++ Makefile @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ VERSION = 4 PATCHLEVEL = 15 SUBLEVEL = 11 -EXTRAVERSION = +EXTRAVERSION =-mq NAME = Fearless Coyote

# DOCUMENTATION]

vp1981 commented on 2018-03-22 01:16 (UTC) (edited on 2018-03-22 01:17 (UTC) by vp1981)

@Terence:

you do not have the option to enable bfq-mq anymore

you mean the kernel cmdline option?

it should appear as bfq-mq in the list of schedulers

I have felling that that's wrong (may be because now BFQ in mainline). Some time ago I tried to follow closely BFQ development and had impression that new 'BFQ-MQ' is now 'BFQ' in mainline. This line

mq-deadline kyber [bfq] none

tells me that bfq in my case is BFQ-MQ (because all these schedulers are MQ).

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 .. 307 Next › Last »