Package Details: linux-enable-ir-emitter 1:4.1.2-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-enable-ir-emitter
Description: Enables infrared cameras that are not directly enabled out-of-the box.
Upstream URL:
Keywords: cameras infrared
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: chicony-ir-toggle, linux-enable-ir-emitter-git
Provides: linux-enable-ir-emitter
Submitter: renyuneyun
Maintainer: EmixamPP (Supdrewin, komex, renyuneyun)
Last Packager: Supdrewin
Votes: 6
Popularity: 0.085022
First Submitted: 2021-06-12 17:19 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-07-05 14:46 (UTC)

Latest Comments

Supdrewin commented on 2022-07-05 14:47 (UTC)

@garabulho, fmt add now

garabulho commented on 2021-12-11 10:59 (UTC)

You should add fmt lib as dependency. Thanks

Ferdinand commented on 2021-10-25 05:38 (UTC)

Works fine now - thanks for the good work :)

Supdrewin commented on 2021-10-25 05:03 (UTC)

Fix it just now, feel free to add a comment if any other issues.

mokacube commented on 2021-10-25 01:21 (UTC)

The checksum of the modified package may have been modified incorrectly.

$ sha256sum 3.2.0.tar.gz 
d3d80204bd55c0faf1d81b49669680bad8edbf9f9938fa41d24f20405ca44930  3.2.0.tar.gz

Also, the following error occurs.

 $ makepkg -ics
==> Extracting sources...
  -> Extracting 3.2.0.tar.gz with bsdtar
==> Starting build()...
make: *** /home/linux/linux-enable-ir-emitter/src/linux-enable-ir-emitter-3.2.0/sources/uvc: No such file or directory.  Stop.
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().

EmixamPP commented on 2021-10-24 17:18 (UTC)

Sorry, that's my bad! I modified the source to quickly fix something. But I forgot that there was a checksum. Sorry @Supdrewin for breaking your work.

Ferdinand commented on 2021-10-24 17:02 (UTC)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums...
    3.2.0.tar.gz ... FAILED
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

Supdrewin commented on 2021-09-25 05:27 (UTC)

@Bevan, thanks!

Bevan commented on 2021-09-24 21:16 (UTC)

Is there a reason why chmod and ln are executed in the install script instead of package()? I would very much prefer having pacman be aware of all files and the correct permissions.

EmixamPP commented on 2021-08-04 20:42 (UTC)

@alerque thank you for your expertise ! The package has been updated to follow the guidelines.

alerque commented on 2021-08-03 17:44 (UTC)

This packaging in goofed up. It using a repository with no fixed version as it's source, and yet it doesn't have a pkgver() function. If it did it would be a VCS package, but that already exists elsewhere. This should be changed to only package tagged stable releases and use fixed source packages (whether tarballs or source builds are git archives, they need to be fixed with a checksum or specific SHA).

renyuneyun commented on 2021-07-28 14:26 (UTC)

@komex Apologise for that. I'm really busy recently (together with other issues). I'm happy to let others take care of this package. I'll orphan it now. (May be back with an updated PKGBUILD if got free time + no others have updated it.)

komex commented on 2021-07-27 12:34 (UTC)

Hi, @renyuneyun! This version of package is outdated. Can you, please, update with