Package Details: linux-fsync-nobara-bin 6.11.9-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/linux-fsync-nobara-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: linux-fsync-nobara-bin
Description: The Linux kernel and modules of Nobara Project - Prebuilt version
Upstream URL: https://nobaraproject.org
Licenses: GPL2
Provides: KSMBD-MODULE, NTFS3-MODULE, VIRTUALBOX-GUEST-MODULES, WIREGUARD-MODULE
Submitter: figue
Maintainer: figue
Last Packager: figue
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.006057
First Submitted: 2022-11-15 19:21 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-11-18 22:01 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (6)

Sources (6)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

orlfman commented on 2023-12-28 17:38 (UTC)

does this one use the new EEVDF scheduler?

nadanke commented on 2023-12-10 11:19 (UTC)

@Mithras: if you do gpg --locate-keys torvalds@kernel.org it works

Mithras commented on 2023-10-21 03:15 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-21 03:19 (UTC) by Mithras)

Well, for anybody else having this issue: https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/696474 Essentially fedora is being fedora. You have to sign nvidia-dkms module if you want secure boot because fedora decided to ignore module.sig_enforce=0.

Mithras commented on 2023-10-20 04:43 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-20 04:46 (UTC) by Mithras)

Can somebody confirm it works for nvidia-beta-dkms? It boots but doesn't load nvidia with "failed to insert module nvidia_uvm" for me.

No, I didn't forget to generate dkms:

$ dkms status
nvidia/545.23.06, 6.5.7-201.fsync.fc38.x86_64, x86_64: installed
nvidia/545.23.06, 6.5.7-arch1-1, x86_64: installed

No, no errors from dracut. Dracut log for linux is the exact same as for linux-fsync-nobara-bin.

No it's not related to secure boot (I build UKIs and sign the whole thing):

$ sudo sbctl verify
Verifying file database and EFI images in /efi...
✓ /efi/EFI/BOOT/BOOTX64.EFI is signed
✓ /efi/EFI/Linux/archlinux-linux-fsync-nobara-bin.efi is signed
✓ /efi/EFI/Linux/archlinux-linux.efi is signed
✓ /efi/EFI/systemd/systemd-bootx64.efi is signed

Mithras commented on 2023-10-20 02:00 (UTC) 

gpg --recv-keys 647F28654894E3BD457199BE38DBBDC86092693E

works though

Mithras commented on 2023-10-20 01:41 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-20 01:41 (UTC) by Mithras)

I get this when I try to install the package:

gpg: keyserver receive failed: No data
error: failed to run: gpg --recv-keys ABAF11C65A2970B130ABE3C479BE3E4300411886

inittux commented on 2023-10-02 11:14 (UTC)

@figue the building of the nvidia modules gets triggered when nvidia-dkms is installed or updated. And because I have dracut configured to have the nvidia modules included in my initramfs dracut was throwing an error during the building of the initramfs because of the modules not built for linux-fsync-nobara-bin. So this should be a one time thing I would think since I have never had to do it for any of my other installed kernels, if not I will create a pacman hook for it if I run into it again.

figue commented on 2023-10-02 11:04 (UTC)

@inittux great! I don't know how dracut works, but maybe you have to configure nvidia module somewhere to trigger the build when it needs.

inittux commented on 2023-10-02 10:58 (UTC) (edited on 2023-10-02 11:00 (UTC) by inittux)

I got it working now. I reinstalled nvidia-dkms that forced a rebuild of all the nvidia modules for all installed kernels. After that when I installed linux-fsync-nobara-bin and dracut succeeded without any errors. It had slipped my mind that dracut doesn't build nvidia modules but only the initramfs but that it does look for the needed modules to include in the initramfs. And that nvidia-dkms does the building of the nvidia modules, I am now booted into the linux-fsync-nobara-bin kernel with a graphical session. I actually can't believe how I missed that the whole time. Thank you for thinking it through with me!

figue commented on 2023-10-02 10:36 (UTC)

Yes, headers are included.

I tried installing nvidia-dkms and nvidia module builds fine:

/usr/lib/modules/6.5.5-201.fsync.fc38.x86_64/updates/dkms/nvidia.ko.xz

Can you confirm that nvidia.ko module is built fine?

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »