Package Details: monitorix 3.10.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/monitorix.git (read-only)
Package Base: monitorix
Description: A lightweight system monitoring tool that uses rrd databases.
Upstream URL: http://www.monitorix.org
Licenses: GPLv2
Conflicts: monitorix-git
Submitter: None
Maintainer: graysky
Last Packager: graysky
Votes: 101
Popularity: 0.442567
First Submitted: 2010-01-24 13:53
Last Updated: 2018-03-15 20:02

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Next › Last »

graysky commented on 2013-12-15 17:59

Not sure what you mean... if you believe you found a bug, please contact the author. You can create a new issue on github: https://github.com/mikaku/Monitorix/issues

linusfan commented on 2013-12-15 17:34

After installation and configuration functions obtained after pressing "OK" on the home page a new page with a "404 - Not found". The CGI path in /srv/http/monitorix/index.html is incorrect and should read: <form action="cgi/monitorix.cgi" method="get">

graysky commented on 2013-12-07 12:20

Bump to v3.4.0-1

graysky commented on 2013-11-26 23:42

Bump to v3.3.1-2

graysky commented on 2013-11-26 23:40

Ah, you are correct... should be 'EnvironmentFile'

https://github.com/mikaku/Monitorix/pull/32

supersym commented on 2013-11-26 21:53

My journalctl:
[/usr/lib/systemd/system/monitorix.service:8] Unknown lvalue 'EnvironmentFiles' in section 'Service'

Typo. This should be 'EnvironmentFile' probably.

graysky commented on 2013-08-12 21:18

Bump to v3.3.0-1

graysky commented on 2013-06-03 20:15

Bump to v3.2.1-1

graysky commented on 2013-01-12 22:54

Just as an FYI: this PKG will provide the stable release of 2.x while the following package will provide the 3.x series which is currently in beta status. Once the beta status has been removed, I will ask that the 'monitorix-beta' package gets deleted and this one will be updated to the 3.x branch.

https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/monitorix-beta

Enjoy!

graysky commented on 2012-10-10 19:13

@DF - OK. I have modified the service file per your suggestion. Thank you!