Search Criteria
Package Details: nvidia-beta-dkms 515.57-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-beta-dkms.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-beta-dkms |
Description: | NVIDIA driver sources for linux (beta version) |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nvidia.com/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | nvidia, nvidia-dkms |
Provides: | nvidia, nvidia-beta, nvidia-dkms, NVIDIA-MODULE |
Submitter: | alucryd |
Maintainer: | dbermond |
Last Packager: | dbermond |
Votes: | 52 |
Popularity: | 0.013304 |
First Submitted: | 2013-03-12 11:21 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-06-28 17:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
Required by (43)
- bumblebee-forceunload (requires nvidia) (optional)
- bumblebee-git (requires nvidia) (optional)
- bumblebee-picasso-git (requires nvidia) (optional)
- conky-lua-nv (requires nvidia) (optional)
- cryptohazemultiforcer (requires nvidia)
- cudapm1 (requires nvidia)
- deepin-nvidia-prime-git (requires nvidia)
- gpu-burn-git (requires nvidia)
- gpu-viewer (requires nvidia) (optional)
- hoomd-blue (requires nvidia) (optional)
- lutris-wine-git (requires nvidia) (optional)
- lutris-wine-git (requires nvidia-dkms) (optional)
- lutris-world-of-warcraft-dependencies-nvidia (requires nvidia)
- mfaktc (requires nvidia)
- mhwd-nvidia (requires nvidia-dkms) (make)
- monitorix (requires nvidia) (optional)
- monitorix-git (requires nvidia) (optional)
- mumax3 (requires nvidia)
- nsight-graphics (requires NVIDIA-MODULE)
- nuxhash-git (requires nvidia)
Latest Comments
tukusejssirs commented on 2022-06-08 15:49 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-05 10:22 (UTC) by tukusejssirs)
@dbermond, do you mean like this? It does not work. Both paths exist and are built.
If it is not obvious, I get exactly the ~~same~~ similar error as @ChrisK.
Update
Running
yay -Syu
while it contains updates ofnvidia-utils-beta nvidia-beta-dkms
(both packages should be clean-built) actually fails with this error:The only way I found to ~~fix~~ work around this error is to reinstall it like this:
dbermond commented on 2022-06-06 20:54 (UTC)
@ChrisK The package already depends on "nvidia-utils-beta=${pkgver}" (see the PKGBUILD). You need to separately build nvidia-utils-beta and nvidia-beta-dkms, and then install both together with 'pacman -U path/to/nivida-utils-beta path/to/nvidia-beta-dkms'.
ChrisK commented on 2022-06-06 10:14 (UTC) (edited on 2022-06-06 10:15 (UTC) by ChrisK)
need to update nvidia-utils-beta version dependency:
dbermond commented on 2022-05-12 04:49 (UTC)
I have prepared nvidia-open-beta and nvidia-open-beta-dkms for those who are interested. VCS (-git) packages are also available. Notice that open source modules currently has limitations in comparison to proprietary modules.
nardis commented on 2021-12-14 06:35 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-14 06:36 (UTC) by nardis)
Note, installation is borked if
/usr/lib/modprobe.d/nvidia.conf
file exists:Fixed by manually removing noted file.
dbermond commented on 2021-10-14 19:07 (UTC)
Note: gbm egl support requires egl-wayland 1.1.8. The repository egl-wayland is currently at version 1.1.7. Use egl-wayland-git if you need this feature until 1.1.8 reaches the official repositories.
k3d3 commented on 2021-10-10 18:43 (UTC)
Yep, my mistake. I haven't had enough coffee this morning.
dbermond commented on 2021-10-10 18:31 (UTC)
Thanks @Nielzsen, this is correct. This package is not for the vulkan driver, and @k3d3 is referring to the vulkan driver software. The referred version 470.62.05 is also lesser than the current 470.74.
Nielzsen commented on 2021-10-10 17:48 (UTC)
@k3d3 I think you are confusing this package with https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/nvidia-vulkan/ The article you linked confirms the update is for the Vulkan drivers.
dbermond commented on 2021-08-02 18:16 (UTC)
@Akholic I had no problems when updating to linux 5.13.7. The nvidia modules were built fine with this package.
Akholic commented on 2021-08-02 16:30 (UTC) (edited on 2021-08-02 22:40 (UTC) by Akholic)
Hi, dkms fails to install this pacakage against 5.13.7-arch1-1 with the following error:
==> dkms install --no-depmod -m nvidia -v 470.57.02 -k 5.13.7-arch1-1 Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.13.7-arch1-1 (x86_64) Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/470.57.02/build/make.log for more information. ==> Warning, `dkms install --no-depmod -m nvidia -v 470.57.02 -k 5.13.7-arch1-1' returned 10 ==> depmod 5.13.7-arch1-1 depmod: ERROR: could not open directory /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1: No such file or directory depmod: FATAL: could not search modules: No such file or directory ==> Warning, `depmod 5.13.7-arch1-1' returned 1
the make logfile reports the following:
DKMS make.log for nvidia-470.57.02 for kernel 5.13.7-arch1-1 (x86_64) Mon Aug 2 06:19:34 PM CEST 2021 make[1]: *** /lib/modules/5.13.7-arch1-1/build: No such file or directory. Stop. make: *** [Makefile:80: modules] Error 2
EDIT: after further investigation it was the actual kernel upgrade giving me problems. sorry for the pollution, @dbermond and thanks for the quick feedback!
dbermond commented on 2021-06-27 03:47 (UTC)
@JDAturbo fixed.
JDAturbo commented on 2021-06-25 22:33 (UTC) (edited on 2021-06-25 22:35 (UTC) by JDAturbo)
Getting this error when running mkinitcpio -P after installing nvidia-beta-dkms 470.42.01-1: ==> ERROR: module not found: `nvidia_drm'
Looks like you forgot to increment the index to 4 for nvidia-peermem:
+BUILT_MODULE_NAME[3]="nvidia-drm" +DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[3]="/kernel/drivers/video" ++BUILT_MODULE_NAME[3]="nvidia-peermem" ++DEST_MODULE_LOCATION[3]="/kernel/drivers/video"
drgr33n commented on 2021-06-25 10:52 (UTC)
Please bump to 470.41.01
dbermond commented on 2021-04-01 17:09 (UTC)
@shoober420 Having depends specified at the package() function does not make any difference in the case of this package, since we are not building any binaries here, but just packaging source files. This will let the user to build the package without having the matching nvidia-utils-beta installed. Being such, a user can separately build all the needed packages and install them at once for convenience. Dependency will be enforced at install time.
shoober420 commented on 2021-04-01 16:32 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-01 16:36 (UTC) by shoober420)
Since there is only a single package here, shouldn’t the depends section be where it normally is, and not under the package section? Because it’s under package, there is no warning before building that the user cannot resolve “nvidia-utils-beta”. It should warn the user before executing makepkg that nvidia-utils-beta is required, not after the fact. I only see depends under the package section when there are multiple packages within the PKGBUILD, understandably.
dbermond commented on 2021-01-09 02:39 (UTC)
@DDoSolitary Ok, probably it makes sense to have it on conflicts. I have added it. Thanks.
DDoSolitary commented on 2020-12-21 22:09 (UTC) (edited on 2020-12-21 22:10 (UTC) by DDoSolitary)
@dbermond It makes sense, but I still think it should at least conflict with nvidia-dkms in addition to nvidia, becase 1) On a system with nvidia-dkms already installed, installing nvidia-beta-dkms will fail because nvidia-utils-beta conflicts with nvidia-utils, but nvidia-utils is required by nvidia-dkms. I have to uninstall nvidia-dkms manually instead of simply pressing a "Y" on conflict, which is a bit inconvenient. 2) nvidia-beta-dkms and nvidia-dkms will in fact conflict if the latter is updated but the former is not.
dbermond commented on 2020-12-21 22:01 (UTC)
@DDoSolitary And you can take a look at other -dkms packages of the official repositories. You'll see that almost all of them conflicts (when a conflict is applicable [when a base package is also available]) with the base package or with the base module, following the Wiki example (witch should be followed). nvidia-dkms and virtualbox-{guest,host}-dkms are the only ones that are different. This package follows the Wiki.
DDoSolitary commented on 2020-12-21 21:37 (UTC)
@dbermond It's just an example. You can take a look at the official extra/nvidia-dkms package, which doesn't conflicts with extra/nvidia.
dbermond commented on 2020-12-21 21:30 (UTC)
@DDoSolitary https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DKMS_package_guidelines#PKGBUILD
DDoSolitary commented on 2020-12-21 08:59 (UTC)
I think it should conflicts with nvidia-dkms rather than nvidia
dbermond commented on 2020-11-28 16:41 (UTC)
@wden Fixed.
wden commented on 2020-11-28 16:38 (UTC) (edited on 2020-11-28 16:44 (UTC) by wden)
I'm getting the patch error with this new update.
==> Validating source files with sha256sums... NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-455.45.01-no-compat32.run ... Passed 110-nvidia-change-dkms-conf.patch ... FAILED 120-nvidia-linux-rt-gift.patch ... Passed ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
I don't use any tools, I manually git clone and makepkg.
dbermond commented on 2020-09-17 22:48 (UTC)
@Lunia Fixed.
Lunia commented on 2020-09-17 22:48 (UTC)
Ah yeah, I nuked my .cache folder. Now it works, thanks!
Det commented on 2020-09-17 22:42 (UTC)
The .patch was updated, but since the name doesn't change, your tools probably think it's the same file, and never re-download it.
Lunia commented on 2020-09-17 22:39 (UTC) (edited on 2020-09-17 22:40 (UTC) by Lunia)
110-nvidia-change-dkms-conf.patch ... FAILED
Error is back.
dbermond commented on 2020-07-12 14:06 (UTC)
@Alex_Nowhere Thanks. Patches updated.
Alex_Nowhere commented on 2020-07-12 14:02 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-12 14:04 (UTC) by Alex_Nowhere)
@dbermond , error on update:
dbermond commented on 2020-01-28 02:37 (UTC) (edited on 2020-01-28 02:43 (UTC) by dbermond)
@errcsool This is a driver package. opencl and cuda are given by nvidia-utils-beta. Just install nvidia-utils-beta and opencl-nvidia-beta for opencl and cuda support within the nvidia beta software. Depending on usage you may also need the cuda package from the official repositories.
errcsool commented on 2020-01-27 22:39 (UTC)
How could I modify this for OpenCL/CUDA support?
dbermond commented on 2019-11-03 14:02 (UTC)
@marcBarbier This is a known bug from nvidia side.
Please see: https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1065080/-bug-nvidia-440-26-modules-not-building/?offset=13
marcBarbier commented on 2019-10-26 10:37 (UTC) (edited on 2019-10-26 10:38 (UTC) by marcBarbier)
Bug with 5.3.7-arch1-1-ARCH when i try to do
dkms autoinstall
i get
Error! Bad return status for module build on kernel: 5.3.7-arch1-1-ARCH (x86_64)
Consult /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/440.26/build/make.log for more information.
cat /var/lib/dkms/nvidia/440.26/build/make.log reveal that the error is due to this missing include
include <asm/system.h>
SibrenVasse commented on 2018-06-18 09:30 (UTC)
Ah, sorry. Fixed.
hexdsl commented on 2018-06-18 08:21 (UTC)
Having this error:
==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.
anyone else?
hexdsl commented on 2018-06-18 08:21 (UTC)
Having this error:
==> ERROR: Integrity checks (sha256) differ in size from the source array.
anyone else?
zfkerr commented on 2018-05-04 16:05 (UTC)
@SibrenVasse, @alucryd https://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=NVIDIA-396.18.07-Vulkan
Det commented on 2018-05-02 21:01 (UTC)
You should update the arch=('i686' 'x86_64' 'armv7h') too.
Det commented on 2018-02-17 22:02 (UTC)
Can you remove me from co-maintainers?
anish commented on 2017-11-24 23:36 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-11-24 23:07 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-11-04 23:10 (UTC)
droidmahn commented on 2017-07-25 18:32 (UTC)
anish commented on 2017-07-25 00:21 (UTC)
droidmahn commented on 2017-07-24 23:27 (UTC)
ArthurBorsboom commented on 2017-05-26 21:07 (UTC)
ArthurBorsboom commented on 2017-05-26 21:06 (UTC)
gloriouseggroll commented on 2017-05-07 23:57 (UTC) (edited on 2017-05-08 00:41 (UTC) by gloriouseggroll)
Terence commented on 2017-04-13 19:22 (UTC) (edited on 2017-04-13 19:23 (UTC) by Terence)
ArthurBorsboom commented on 2017-04-07 06:08 (UTC)
ArthurBorsboom commented on 2017-03-19 09:43 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-02-19 13:26 (UTC)
Anthony25 commented on 2017-02-19 13:21 (UTC)
anish commented on 2017-01-21 21:00 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-01-21 20:56 (UTC)
anish commented on 2017-01-21 20:18 (UTC)
Anthony25 commented on 2017-01-21 14:30 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-01-21 13:57 (UTC)
cbowman57 commented on 2017-01-21 13:18 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-01-21 13:10 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-21 13:10 (UTC) by Det)
Anthony25 commented on 2017-01-21 12:21 (UTC)
Det commented on 2017-01-19 20:52 (UTC)
saildata commented on 2017-01-13 22:20 (UTC)
Det commented on 2016-10-05 17:24 (UTC)
sylex commented on 2016-10-05 17:22 (UTC)
Det commented on 2016-06-14 14:26 (UTC)
Vash63 commented on 2016-06-14 05:20 (UTC)
Det commented on 2016-05-20 02:28 (UTC)
Vash63 commented on 2016-05-19 21:09 (UTC) (edited on 2016-05-19 21:42 (UTC) by Vash63)
Det commented on 2016-03-23 15:31 (UTC)
droidmahn commented on 2016-03-23 09:39 (UTC)
Xaero252 commented on 2015-10-18 03:31 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-10-15 15:34 (UTC)
Xaero252 commented on 2015-10-15 15:29 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-15 05:34 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-10-15 04:07 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-15 03:55 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-10-15 03:38 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-10-15 03:38 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-15 03:37 (UTC)
Xaero252 commented on 2015-10-15 03:18 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-10-14 17:38 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-14 17:01 (UTC) (edited on 2015-10-14 17:04 (UTC) by Det)
anish commented on 2015-10-14 16:53 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-10-14 16:53 (UTC)
AnAkkk commented on 2015-10-14 16:52 (UTC) (edited on 2015-10-14 16:52 (UTC) by AnAkkk)
Det commented on 2015-10-14 16:49 (UTC)
AnAkkk commented on 2015-10-14 16:47 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-14 16:41 (UTC) (edited on 2015-10-14 16:42 (UTC) by Det)
AnAkkk commented on 2015-10-14 16:33 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-10-14 16:31 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-14 16:29 (UTC) (edited on 2015-10-14 16:29 (UTC) by Det)
sanerb commented on 2015-10-14 16:26 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-10-14 16:18 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-10-14 16:17 (UTC)
juston_li commented on 2015-09-25 16:52 (UTC)
davispuh commented on 2015-09-25 15:43 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-08-03 20:22 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-08-03 20:21 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-08-03 20:15 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-08-03 16:53 (UTC)
Det commented on 2015-08-03 16:42 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-08-03 01:52 (UTC)
evana commented on 2015-08-01 21:55 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-04-29 23:14 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-04-29 22:37 (UTC)
Archange commented on 2015-04-29 15:02 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-03-25 05:43 (UTC)
anish commented on 2015-03-25 05:42 (UTC)
sanerb commented on 2015-03-25 05:39 (UTC)
Archange commented on 2015-01-16 10:50 (UTC)
cbowman57 commented on 2014-12-17 18:06 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-11-14 03:55 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-08-12 04:03 (UTC)
evana commented on 2014-08-06 05:20 (UTC)
AnAkkk commented on 2014-04-08 14:49 (UTC)
felixonmars commented on 2014-03-28 02:48 (UTC)
felixonmars commented on 2014-03-26 15:42 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-02-07 18:00 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2014-02-07 08:35 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-02-06 21:49 (UTC)
cbowman57 commented on 2014-02-06 21:44 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-02-06 19:34 (UTC)
evana commented on 2014-01-30 18:06 (UTC)
anish commented on 2014-01-28 12:57 (UTC)
evana commented on 2014-01-27 22:43 (UTC)
evana commented on 2013-11-08 05:30 (UTC)
evana commented on 2013-11-06 17:08 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-10-31 21:15 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-10-27 02:12 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-10-26 09:12 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-09-17 08:35 (UTC)
evana commented on 2013-09-16 19:11 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-09-09 22:57 (UTC)
adytzu2007 commented on 2013-09-09 20:56 (UTC)
evana commented on 2013-09-09 13:08 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-07-10 07:57 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-05-28 23:54 (UTC)
evana commented on 2013-05-28 05:47 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-05-24 05:03 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-05-08 00:42 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-05-02 21:02 (UTC)
adytzu2007 commented on 2013-05-02 18:53 (UTC)
z1lt0id commented on 2013-04-10 00:43 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-04-03 23:04 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-04-03 22:22 (UTC)
alucryd commented on 2013-03-12 11:27 (UTC)
alucryd commented on 2013-03-06 13:58 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-03-05 21:28 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-03-04 09:13 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-03-04 01:55 (UTC)
Det commented on 2013-02-20 03:06 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-02-16 09:51 (UTC)
alucryd commented on 2013-02-13 17:49 (UTC)
patryk commented on 2013-01-25 09:33 (UTC)
Youpi commented on 2013-01-25 08:35 (UTC)
anish commented on 2013-01-25 06:55 (UTC)
gtmanfred commented on 2013-01-25 03:53 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-01-25 01:29 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-01-25 01:28 (UTC)
brenix commented on 2013-01-24 22:38 (UTC)
Youpi commented on 2013-01-23 09:31 (UTC)
felixonmars commented on 2013-01-23 04:04 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-01-22 22:11 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-01-17 16:21 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2013-01-16 13:01 (UTC)
alucryd commented on 2012-11-22 15:27 (UTC)
ShyPixie commented on 2012-11-22 14:05 (UTC)
alucryd commented on 2012-11-18 08:15 (UTC)
ShyPixie commented on 2012-11-18 04:38 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2012-11-14 14:08 (UTC)
robertfoster commented on 2012-11-14 10:22 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2012-09-12 23:19 (UTC)
muflone commented on 2012-09-12 22:21 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2012-03-23 16:10 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2012-03-21 18:16 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-12-31 16:35 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-12-29 14:02 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-09-14 12:02 (UTC)
Det commented on 2011-09-14 08:42 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-09-10 14:08 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-06-30 03:24 (UTC)
sl1pkn07 commented on 2011-06-06 13:37 (UTC)