Package Details: mutter-performance 1:47.1.r2.g74cf8ac0f-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/mutter-performance.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: mutter-performance
Description: A window manager for GNOME | Attempts to improve performances with non-upstreamed merge-requests and frequent stable branch resync
Upstream URL: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Groups: gnome
Conflicts: mutter
Provides: libmutter-15.so, mutter
Submitter: Terence
Maintainer: Terence (Saren, saltyming)
Last Packager: saltyming
Votes: 78
Popularity: 0.183115
First Submitted: 2019-07-09 09:35 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-22 08:26 (UTC)

Required by (16)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

saltyming commented on 2022-03-22 09:37 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-22 08:27 (UTC) by saltyming)

If you have a problem during any system update with mutter-performance & gnome-shell-performance, please install mutter & gnome-shell packages from the main repository and do full upgrade first, then build the performance packages later.

If you are using [gnome-unstable] and [extra-testing] repositories, use mutter-performance-unstable

The default patch list includes "Dynamic triple buffering(!1441)", "text-input-v1(!3751)".

Latest Dynamic triple buffering patch has several included MRs from the main development branch to achieve maximum performance.

To enable a specific MR in the Merge Requests List, add an line "_merge_requests_to_use+=('<MR number>')" at the end of PKGBUILD. (Because if you edit the line directly you can be able to end up with merge conflict upon updates.)

You can see some patches' git history here: https://git.saltyming.net/sungmg/mutter-performance-source/

Saren commented on 2018-08-30 14:52 (UTC) (edited on 2020-10-06 05:50 (UTC) by Saren)

If you are getting errors like fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' while building this package, refer to PKGBUILD and see which patches caused this. Then, go to the related URLs, replace the commit hashes. If there are conflicts, comment out the patches.

Please notify me in comment section if this happens.

The optional performance patches are by default enabled.

A package for gnome-shell performance patches: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/gnome-shell-performance/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 64 Next › Last »

deezid commented on 2019-06-13 11:52 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-13 11:53 (UTC) by deezid)

!602 commit has been updated to: f12eddc1 Also add !568 https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/568/commits which will lower CPU usage while dragging windows. Testing atm and seems to do the job.

deezid commented on 2019-06-12 22:34 (UTC)

!189 updated commit to e702cbc7 Everything works just fine

kode54 commented on 2019-06-11 04:18 (UTC)

s/bfdf54fa/eddfdfcd/ s/fd2a7562/dfb1ef0c/

Both pull requests were just rebased 18 hours ago.

btd1337 commented on 2019-06-11 02:13 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-11 02:21 (UTC) by btd1337)

fatal: bad revision 'bfdf54fa'

fatal: bad revision 'fd2a7562'

emji commented on 2019-06-10 20:06 (UTC)

My installation through octopi first failed with a fatal: bad revision 'bfdf54fa'. After commenting this one it was a fatal: bad revision '73e8cf32' which had to be commented as well. I used octopi on Manjaro for installation which crashed after it had finished the installation. I think it still did well, at least shows as being installed.

Terence commented on 2019-06-09 02:00 (UTC)

@mwohah I'd need you to do the report yourself: https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/issues as you are the one who can add details. Don't forget to mention this is a regression caused by !579. Thanks in advance.

@glorious-yellow Thanks, updated.

glorious-yellow commented on 2019-06-07 23:09 (UTC)

https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/mutter/merge_requests/363 has been merged

Terence commented on 2019-06-07 16:02 (UTC)

@mwohah Thank you very much for your investigation, I'm reporting the problem upstream.

Terence commented on 2019-06-07 16:00 (UTC) (edited on 2019-06-07 16:01 (UTC) by Terence)

@Saren I think we need to open a forum post for this package and gnome-shell-performance so we can keep discussion here to a minimum as it's not really designed for discussions like that.

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 .. 64 Next › Last »