Package Details: opencl-nvidia-390xx 390.157-17

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: nvidia-390xx-utils
Description: OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA
Upstream URL: https://www.nvidia.com/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: opencl-nvidia
Provides: opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia
Submitter: svenstaro
Maintainer: jonathon (vnctdj)
Last Packager: vnctdj
Votes: 61
Popularity: 0.69
First Submitted: 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-12 22:18 (UTC)

Dependencies (2)

Required by (67)

Sources (20)

Pinned Comments

vnctdj commented on 2025-01-24 07:37 (UTC)

Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926

jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)

Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.

jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)

The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that linux-headers should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.

As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when linux is not an installed kernel?

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 .. 33 Next › Last »

drankinatty commented on 2023-02-28 05:46 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-28 05:48 (UTC) by drankinatty)

Since we are in need of a long-term maintainer, and since @vnctd did such a good job handling the patches for glibc-2.37 and the 6.2 kernel patch, I would nominate @vnctd as the new maintainer -- if he will do it.

I fumbled around getting the package to build without the patch to the point of drm failure, but then would have been stuck until I could find an existing patch for it. I know C and understood the errors

nv-acpi.c:77:19: error: initialization of XXX  from incompatible pointer type YYY
    77 |         .remove = nv_acpi_remove_two_args,

and

nvidia-drm-drv.c:244:21: error: ‘struct drm_mode_config’ has no member named ‘fb_base’
  244 |     dev->mode_config.fb_base = 0;

However, it would likely have taken me a bit more time to arrive at a full solution -- so I'm not the guy. Anyone else have a 2nd or other thoughts?

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-02-20 23:24 (UTC)

@vnctdj: Modifying the patch was not necessary. The patch expects to already be in the kernel directory, just cd into it before applying the patch. FYI, this is very common for patches like this.

susanne commented on 2023-02-11 20:58 (UTC)

@vnctdj thank you so much for your action! :-)

vnctdj commented on 2023-02-10 22:47 (UTC)

I've just updated the PKGBUILD with the following solution : https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2083699#p2083699

Thanks to everyone who participated!

hellopoisonx commented on 2023-02-10 13:20 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-10 13:21 (UTC) by hellopoisonx)

@Piezo Unbelievable!!echo "/usr/lib/tls" > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia.conf ; ldconfig really worked for me!Thank you a lot

bobarch64 commented on 2023-02-10 04:55 (UTC)

The maintainer @jonathon has passed away, the new maintainer will probably get note of the provided solution from @Piezo. Thanks Piezo for the solution

canolucas commented on 2023-02-10 01:38 (UTC)

@vnctdj please can you update the pkgbuild and apply any of the solutions discussed in this forum thread: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=2083569

BlackIkeEagle commented on 2023-02-09 18:20 (UTC)

patch for the upcoming 6.2 kernel: https://gitlab.com/herecura/packages/nvidia-390xx-dkms/-/blob/780a3c8b159f24c14e6c1cb35fd747338aefea39/kernel-6.2.patch

drankinatty commented on 2023-02-09 06:38 (UTC)

Bloody Brilliant! echo "/usr/lib/tls" > /etc/ld.so.conf.d/nvidia.conf ; ldconfig is working like a champ. Lord knows how you sorted that out, but thank you!

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 .. 33 Next › Last »