@jonathon Thank you
Search Criteria
Package Details: opencl-nvidia-390xx 390.157-13
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/nvidia-390xx-utils.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | nvidia-390xx-utils |
Description: | OpenCL implemention for NVIDIA |
Upstream URL: | https://www.nvidia.com/ |
Licenses: | custom |
Conflicts: | opencl-nvidia |
Provides: | opencl-driver, opencl-nvidia |
Submitter: | svenstaro |
Maintainer: | jonathon (vnctdj) |
Last Packager: | vnctdj |
Votes: | 61 |
Popularity: | 3.31 |
First Submitted: | 2020-03-11 17:29 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-11-25 23:34 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- opencl-headers (opencl-headers-gitAUR) (optional) – headers necessary for OpenCL development
Required by (66)
- aftershotpro2 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- aftershotpro3 (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- arrayfire-git (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- bfgminer-git (requires opencl-nvidia) (optional)
- computecpp (requires opencl-driver)
- cpu-x-opencl (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- cuda-10.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-10.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-11.7 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-8.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda-9.2 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.1 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda11.4-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0 (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cuda12.0-versioned (requires opencl-nvidia)
- cytoscape (requires opencl-driver) (optional)
- davinci-resolve (requires opencl-driver)
- Show 46 more...
Sources (16)
- gcc-14.patch
- https://us.download.nvidia.com/XFree86/Linux-x86_64/390.157/NVIDIA-Linux-x86_64-390.157.run
- kernel-4.16+-memory-encryption.patch
- kernel-6.10.patch
- kernel-6.12.patch
- kernel-6.2.patch
- kernel-6.3.patch
- kernel-6.4.patch
- kernel-6.5.patch
- kernel-6.6.patch
- kernel-6.8.patch
- nvidia-390xx-utils.sysusers
- nvidia-390xx.rules
- nvidia-drm-outputclass.conf
- systemd-homed-override.conf
- systemd-suspend-override.conf
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next › Last »
CyrIng commented on 2021-04-05 10:05 (UTC)
jonathon commented on 2021-04-01 18:07 (UTC)
That kind of looks like you're using mesa rather than nvidia? If you could use the linked forum thread to provide further details that would be easier than using the comments section here.
CyrIng commented on 2021-03-30 23:08 (UTC)
@jonathon
Using nvidia-390xx-*
plus kernel 5.11.10
and without vulkan-swrast
:
systemd-coredump[....]: Process .... (chromium) of user .... dumped core.
Stack trace of thread ....:
#0 0x00007f... vkGetPhysicalDeviceProperties (libvulkan.so.1 + 0x32b30)
#1 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0xb7b124)
#2 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0xf99a5e)
#3 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0x15c067)
#4 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0x6e102e)
#5 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0x156801)
#6 0x00007f... n/a (swrast_dri.so + 0x60a869)
#7 0x00007f... n/a (libGLX_mesa.so.0 + 0x3bd12)
#8 0x00007f... n/a (libGLX_mesa.so.0 + 0x356de)
#9 0x00007f... n/a (libGLX_mesa.so.0 + 0x365f1)
...
jonathon commented on 2021-03-30 22:13 (UTC)
nvidia-utils
(and nvidia-390xx-utils
) provides vulkan-driver
, which vulkan-swrast
also provides. I wonder if this might be related to https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/65118 ...
jonathon commented on 2021-03-29 21:48 (UTC)
@Cyring, more information needed please. What exactly are you requesting?
CyrIng commented on 2021-03-29 10:02 (UTC)
Since Vulkan became a thing, It is apparently not possible to start various apps (chromium,firefox ...) without a Vulkan driver. As stated in Wiki, and despite this driver warnings: vulkan-swrast package is requested with nvidia-390
itsnotme commented on 2021-01-10 00:09 (UTC)
@carneeki: You can skip dependency version checks using the --nodeps option (or short: -d). So the full command would look like this: yay -S nvidia-390xx-dkms nvidia-390xx-utils --nodeps
jonathon commented on 2020-10-19 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-11 14:18 (UTC) by jonathon)
PACKAGE NEEDS LONG TERM MAINTAINER
I have adopted the 390xx packages to keep them secure. I do not run any 390xx hardware so will not notice any breakages and cannot test any changes.
Until such time as someone else steps up to maintain these packages - ideally someone who actually has 390xx hardware - I have to rely on you to tell me what changes are needed.
Don't expect a response if you post only "this doesn't work", and do not email me to complain about the package not working!
Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926
A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.
Pinned Comments
jonathon commented on 2022-05-26 09:46 (UTC)
Please don't flag this package out-of-date unless a new version has been released by NVIDIA.
jonathon commented on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) (edited on 2021-12-26 22:44 (UTC) by jonathon)
The DKMS package guidelines are explicit that
linux-headers
should not be a dependency of any DKMS package.As a concrete example of why including that as a hard dependency is a bad idea, what happens when
linux
is not an installed kernel?jonathon commented on 2020-10-19 12:41 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-11 14:18 (UTC) by jonathon)
PACKAGE NEEDS LONG TERM MAINTAINER
I have adopted the 390xx packages to keep them secure. I do not run any 390xx hardware so will not notice any breakages and cannot test any changes.
Until such time as someone else steps up to maintain these packages - ideally someone who actually has 390xx hardware - I have to rely on you to tell me what changes are needed.
Don't expect a response if you post only "this doesn't work", and do not email me to complain about the package not working!
Use this forum thread for discussion: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?pid=1946926
A binary package is also available in my kernel-lts unofficial user repository.