Package Details: pacman-static 6.1.0-7

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pacman-static.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pacman-static
Description: Statically-compiled pacman (to fix or install systems without libc)
Upstream URL: https://www.archlinux.org/pacman/
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: mazieres
Maintainer: Morganamilo (andreas_baumann)
Last Packager: andreas_baumann
Votes: 45
Popularity: 2.32
First Submitted: 2013-01-09 02:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-03-31 15:03 (UTC)

Dependencies (5)

Required by (0)

Sources (33)

Pinned Comments

Morganamilo commented on 2022-02-20 18:30 (UTC)

There's now a custom repo and binaries again. Though only for x86_64 currently.

Custom Repo
[pacman-static]
SigLevel = Required
Server = https://pkgbuild.com/~morganamilo/$repo/$arch
Pre compiled binaries

https://pkgbuild.com/~morganamilo/pacman-static/x86_64/bin/

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 .. 11 Next › Last »

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-30 19:25 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-30 19:32 (UTC) by andreas_baumann)

@BryanLiang: upstream also uses https://git.tukaani.org/xz.git#tag=v${pkgver}") with pkgver=5.6.1. So this is presumably ok to take. But I prefer to wait a little bit for official statements and a 5.6.2 version..

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-30 18:40 (UTC)

Another round in the Easter egg hunt for xz 5.4.6, resorting now to the version on SourceForge. Also removed possibly compromised PGP keys.

greyltc commented on 2024-03-30 18:04 (UTC)

Can this please be removed from the package? '22D465F2B4C173803B20C6DE59FCF207FEA7F445') # Jia Tan jiat0218@gmail.com

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-30 17:09 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-30 18:18 (UTC) by andreas_baumann)

@BryanLiang: You don't expect me to use any source tarball I didn't verify myself against the one used in the old pkg source package on archive.org. :-) Fedora happens to have the same tarball for 5.4.6 only, that's why I rather take this one.

BryanLiang commented on 2024-03-30 12:02 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-30 12:06 (UTC) by BryanLiang)

@andreas_baumann I found a git repo which is still working https://git.tukaani.org/xz.git from a reddit comment.

But I'm not sure the git repo is trusted.

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-30 08:41 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-30 09:31 (UTC) by andreas_baumann)

Strange things happening here with xz:

https://github.com/tukaani-project/xz

This repository has been disabled.

" Access to this repository has been disabled by GitHub Staff due to a violation of GitHub's terms of service. If you are the owner of the repository, you may reach out to GitHub Support for more information. "

More on this https://www.phoronix.com/news/GitHub-Disables-XZ-Repo.

Getting 5.4.6 from Fedora for now. (Could also take them from sources.archive.org, but then the tarball and signature are not easy accessible from there).

Upstream xz 5.6.1 is patched with a versoin from the (for now) not available github repo, so..

phoepsilonix commented on 2024-03-23 11:40 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-24 22:46 (UTC) by phoepsilonix)

Proposal.
Add -ffat-lto-objects flag to LTOFLAGS to prevent mangling of static libs.(gcc)
If We add -ffat-lto-objects to LTOFLAGS, We don't have to worry about specifying lto options in makepkg.conf or PKGBUILD.

diff --git a/PKGBUILD b/PKGBUILD
index 7e96789..525e004 100644
--- a/PKGBUILD
+++ b/PKGBUILD
@@ -139,6 +139,11 @@ fi
 export CFLAGS+=' -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE'
 export CXXFLAGS+=' -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE'

+# Add -ffat-lto-objects flag to LTOFLAGS to prevent mangling of static libs.(gcc)
+# In clang-16, there seems to be no problem without this option specified.
+# (The -ffat-lto-objects option is planned to be supported from clang-17.)
+[[ $CC =~ gcc ]] && export LTOFLAGS+=" -fuse-linker-plugin -ffat-lto-objects"
+
 # keep using xz-compressed packages, because one use of the package is to
 # recover on systems with broken zstd support in libarchive
 [[ $PKGEXT = .pkg.tar.zst ]] && PKGEXT=.pkg.tar.xz

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-14 09:52 (UTC)

Will update to 6.1 when core-stable goes to 6.1 not if core-testing is on 6.1.

andreas_baumann commented on 2024-03-09 16:13 (UTC)

@Archttila: this doesn't explain anything. What where you doing when you got this error message?

Archttila commented on 2024-03-09 15:43 (UTC)

no such file or directory: PKGBUILD