| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/paru.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | paru |
| Description: | Feature packed AUR helper |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/morganamilo/paru |
| Keywords: | AUR helper pacman rust wrapper yay |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Submitter: | Morganamilo |
| Maintainer: | Morganamilo |
| Last Packager: | Morganamilo |
| Votes: | 973 |
| Popularity: | 22.58 |
| First Submitted: | 2020-10-19 00:43 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-09-20 18:50 (UTC) |
@crwn You are wrong. The wiki is clear on that front [1][2].
base-devel is assumed to be installed when using the AUR (and building packages with makepkg generally speaking), dependencies of this package should not be included in makedepends array.
[1] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository#Prerequisites
[2] https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends
@starquake
not everyone needs the entirety of base-devel, pkgconf is still not marked as a dependency, which it should be. this shouldn't even be an argument.
@cwn: pkgconf is installed with base-devel. Which you should have installed before using the AUR. Using an AUR helper is okay but you should be familiar with building it yourself.
More info: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/Arch_User_Repository
Missing pkgconf (make) dependency
@kelvan Install base-devel.
had to install debugedit manually to get it built, should this be a build dep?
Updated: See https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/paru#comment-961914
Getting the following error when building on aarch64:
error[E0308]: mismatched types
--> /build/.cargo/git/checkouts/alpm.rs-a0070a235cf20bfa/306342e/alpm/src/cb.rs:244:60
|
244 | ...s_ptr(), Some(cb), &*ctx as *const _ as *mut _) };
| ---- ^^ expected fn pointer, found fn item
...
error: could not compile `alpm` (lib) due to 1 previous error
Full build log: https://github.com/arch4edu/cactus/actions/runs/8481099248/job/23237899683
hello when using paru i have this error i already uninstall and reinstall it, and i have no problem of time on my linux
"error: error sending request for url (https://aur.archlinux.org/rpc): error trying to connect: error:0A000086:SSL routines:tls_post_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2091: (unable to get issuer certificate): error trying to connect: error:0A000086:SSL routines:tls_post_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2091: (unable to get issuer certificate): error:0A000086:SSL routines:tls_post_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2091: (unable to get issuer certificate): error:0A000086:SSL routines:tls_post_process_server_certificate:certificate verify failed:ssl/statem/statem_clnt.c:2091"
With my previously reported issue worked around, the package starts to build but fails due to an openssl dependency failing to compile, again on ArchlinuxARM armv7h
The following warnings were emitted during compilation:
warning: openssl-sys@0.9.101: cc: error: unrecognized command-line option ‘-mno-omit-leaf-frame-pointer’; did you mean ‘-fno-omit-frame-pointer’?
error: failed to run custom build command for `openssl-sys v0.9.101`
I have successfully switched to using the paru-bin AUR package with the same dependency workaround as my previous comment.
I have a slightly different error building on ARM:
> makepkg -isf
==> Making package: paru 2.0.3-1 (Fri 22 Mar 2024 09:56:18 AM EDT)
==> Checking runtime dependencies...
==> Installing missing dependencies...
error: target not found: libalpm.so>=14-64
==> ERROR: 'pacman' failed to install missing dependencies.
It's an otherwise fully updated Raspi 3, including pacman-6.1.0-3, this seems to indicate that the ArchlinuxARM package supplies the correct version: https://archlinuxarm.org/packages/aarch64/pacman
So I'm not sure why this dependency isn't met...
EDIT: I suspect I'm running armv7h on this, which provides libalpm.so=14-32 instead. Does paru rely specifically on the 64bit version of this library? https://archlinuxarm.org/packages/armv7h/pacman
EDIT 2: a workaround for this issue is to modify the PKGBUILD to require libalpm.so>=14, i.e. don't require the 64bit library.
Pinned Comments
haxie commented on 2023-05-26 17:45 (UTC)
you're better off contacting her via the github, this comments section is 90% "it's out of date" from people who didn't scroll down before posting