Search Criteria
Package Details: pgmodeler 3:1.2.0-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pgmodeler.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pgmodeler |
Description: | PostgreSQL Database Modeler: an open source CASE tool for modeling PostgreSQL databases |
Upstream URL: | https://pgmodeler.io |
Licenses: | GPL3 |
Submitter: | Carlinix |
Maintainer: | marco44 |
Last Packager: | marco44 |
Votes: | 55 |
Popularity: | 0.55 |
First Submitted: | 2014-01-04 05:32 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-05-21 11:22 (UTC) |
Dependencies (3)
- libxml2 (libxml2-gitAUR, libxml2-2.9AUR)
- postgresql-libs (postgresql13-libsAUR, postgresql-libs-gitAUR, postgresql-libs-12AUR)
- qt6-svg
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »
pancakes commented on 2025-05-07 18:08 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-07 18:09 (UTC) by pancakes)
@marco44, there's an obsolete comment here that you may wanna yank out the next time this is bumped!
It says:
And likely related, the source
pgmodeler.appdata.xml
is probably no longer needed because it's the same content as that PR, and is packaged in the upstream releases (src).Thanks for packaging!
marco44 commented on 2023-11-30 13:16 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-30 13:19 (UTC) by marco44)
@sergoops, sorry for the delay, busy week
Should be fixed, a silly typo on my part in the patch
sergoops commented on 2023-11-27 20:17 (UTC) (edited on 2023-11-27 20:20 (UTC) by sergoops)
@marco44, sorry for taking so long to answer, i forgot to enable notifications. The version of libxml2 2.12.1-1. The build is failed with your fix. Error: https://gist.github.com/sergoops/93b32c920e97b1cb6076a03d59b8cb18
marco44 commented on 2023-11-23 17:35 (UTC)
(and of course I reported the problem upstream)
marco44 commented on 2023-11-23 17:35 (UTC)
@sergoops thanks for the report. I just pushed a version which should work around this problem, can you confirm it builds with 2.12 ?
sergoops commented on 2023-11-23 17:08 (UTC)
1.0.6 failed to build with libxml2 2.12.0-1. Downgrading to 2.11.5-1 helped
stefanmp commented on 2023-08-25 19:57 (UTC) (edited on 2023-08-25 19:58 (UTC) by stefanmp)
Thank you for the quick response :-)
I've looked up my
makepkg.conf
, which i haven't modified and as far as i can see,MAKEFLAGS
are commented out per default.As far as i understand the arch wiki for
makepkg
, you can explicitly set parallel build on your own usingmakepkg.conf
. I am not sure what the best practice is here to be honest :)For me,
make
is not buildingpgmodeler
in parallel on two of my machines. I changedmakepkg.conf
now and the package is building in parallel now and like 4x times faster then before :)marco44 commented on 2023-08-25 12:25 (UTC)
On my environment, it's already building in parallel as far as i know, using MAKEFLAGS from makepkg.conf. Which is safer than -j without restriction anyway Are you implying that the MAKEFLAGS are not taken into account ? (possible, but I don't think so)
stefanmp commented on 2023-08-25 10:01 (UTC)
Hej :)
I would like to suggest to build in parallel to speed up the build process and utilize all available cores.
Here is the git patch against the current version of PKGBUILD :)
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 10 Next › Last »