Package Details: pycharm-professional 2024.1.1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-professional.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pycharm-professional
Description: Python IDE for Professional Developers. Professional Edition
Upstream URL: https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/
Keywords: development editor ide jetbrains python
Licenses: custom
Submitter: hippojazz
Maintainer: Xavier (37h4n)
Last Packager: Xavier
Votes: 286
Popularity: 0.93
First Submitted: 2013-09-25 03:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-01 20:08 (UTC)

Dependencies (19)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 .. 43 Next › Last »

Xavier commented on 2018-10-27 15:52 (UTC)

Yeah @philzli, fixed thanks

Philzli commented on 2018-10-26 12:06 (UTC)

This package should conflict with pycharm-community-edition

Xavier commented on 2018-08-25 04:26 (UTC)

Hi @ixil, do you mean the possible to open the pycharm folder projects?

ixil commented on 2018-08-23 21:41 (UTC)

@XavierCLL, any chance the config folders could follow the xdg-guidelines defined in the python scripts? Thanks for your work! :)

dotfile commented on 2018-08-22 14:57 (UTC) (edited on 2018-08-22 14:57 (UTC) by dotfile)

2018.2.1 -> 2018.2.2; ce7313f337b7c20b120a9986cc6d9163ebbc2ef4e9f4743cd057f0730a4d8ec0 -> e7ce851728c411ff2112b82bfabbcb8d20d0433a8d7ce06887588cb278f8c8b1

Xavier commented on 2018-08-09 02:59 (UTC)

Thanks @dreamingincode, I will consider that option.

dreamingincode commented on 2018-07-28 05:15 (UTC)

@XavierCLL

Could you please add back PyCharm without JRE using split package, as done in other JetBrains IDE AUR packages?

Examples: - IntelliJ Idea Ultimate Edition: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=intellij-idea-ultimate-edition - Webstorm: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=webstorm - CLion: https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/tree/PKGBUILD?h=clion

I'm also ready to help if you don't have the time.

Xavier commented on 2018-07-26 17:37 (UTC)

@singularity yeah I forgot to delete that, thanks

Xavier commented on 2018-07-26 17:27 (UTC)

Yes I think the same, the best is that use the native java, I can consider implementing it again, but my experience was not the best, please try and tell me how it works.

Xavier commented on 2018-07-26 17:17 (UTC)

Hi matthias, I tested the no-jdk version and it has some problems using the java of the system related to hdpi support and other issues fixed using the jdk version, then I think that is not recommended to use, at least when jetbrains in the future support java>8