Search Criteria
Package Details: samsung-unified-driver 1.00.39-7
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/samsung-unified-driver.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | samsung-unified-driver |
Description: | Samsung Unified Linux Driver for printers and scanners. |
Upstream URL: | http://www.samsung.com |
Licenses: | custom:samsung |
Submitter: | ptb |
Maintainer: | christoph.gysin |
Last Packager: | christoph.gysin |
Votes: | 224 |
Popularity: | 0.43 |
First Submitted: | 2010-12-06 00:01 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-11-05 20:51 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 17 Next › Last »
dreieck commented on 2023-11-05 15:51 (UTC)
Can you please give each of your package of your metapackage a distinctive individual
$pkgdesc
?E.G.:
samsung-unified-driver-common
→ "Unified Linux Driver for Samsung printers and scanners (common files)."samsung-unified-driver-printer
→ "Unified Linux Driver for Samsung printers."samsung-unified-driver-scanner
→ "Unified Linux Driver for Samsung scanners."samsung-unified-driver
→ "Unified Linux Driver for Samsung printers and scanners. (Metapackage)".Regards!
BrunetteViking commented on 2023-10-04 08:41 (UTC)
This works just fine thank you for your contributions!
itayf commented on 2023-07-06 14:39 (UTC)
My Xpress M2020W works perfectly, thanks!!
Ritch commented on 2022-07-26 09:22 (UTC)
My Samsung Xpress SL-M2026 worked perfectly!
fow0ryl commented on 2022-05-23 17:20 (UTC)
perfect now :)
fow0ryl commented on 2022-05-15 15:47 (UTC)
Please remove line 17 (depends=) in PKGBUILD
There are qualified "depends" statements in function package_samsung-unified-driver-printer and package_samsung-unified-driver-scanner. But "depends" in line 17 overwrites those statements. And because of this i.e sane is installed, even if only printer driver is installed ...
sanatan commented on 2022-03-28 09:05 (UTC)
Hello Dear I came across this reddit page https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/tpimqh/aur_did_it_again/ You really did help me to make my printer working properly. So Thank You
gabrielelinux commented on 2021-09-30 08:31 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-30 08:43 (UTC) by gabrielelinux)
@christoph.gysin: Thank you, I tried to install it on a fresh arch install and it works perfectly.
[EDIT]: Seeing news from the coreutils package, it seems that they are trying to fix this wrong chmod behaviour. It will be fixed with the new update to "coreutils" 9.0.2
christoph.gysin commented on 2021-09-30 07:55 (UTC)
@gabrielelinux: Thanks for reporting, should be fixed now.
gabrielelinux commented on 2021-09-29 21:10 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-29 21:36 (UTC) by gabrielelinux)
I'm having issues installing this AUR package both with paru and with "makepkg -si". The installation stops when the process reaches the "prepare" stage. On terminal it says "An error happened in prepare().".
[EDIT]: Reading similar issues on the AUR packages, like a recent similar issue with the "spotify" package, I think the problem might be related to a change in the chmod command, with the new update of the "coreutils" package. It might affect the installation process because I saw that in the PKGBUILD at the beginning of the prepare() stage, there is a "chmod" command. But this is only an assumption.
1 2 3 4 5 6 .. 17 Next › Last »