Arch Linux User Repository

Search Criteria

Enter search criteria

Search by

Keywords

Out of Date

Sort by

Sort order

Per page

Package Details: snapd 2.62-2

Package Actions

Git Clone URL:	https://aur.archlinux.org/snapd.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base:	snapd
Description:	Service and tools for management of snap packages.
Upstream URL:	https://github.com/snapcore/snapd
Licenses:	GPL3
Conflicts:	snap-confine
Submitter:	Barthalion
Maintainer:	bboozzoo (zyga, mardy)
Last Packager:	bboozzoo
Votes:	210
Popularity:	2.75
First Submitted:	2018-01-07 17:37 (UTC)
Last Updated:	2024-04-29 06:41 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

bboozzoo commented on 2018-10-25 11:56 (UTC) (edited on 2024-04-09 07:39 (UTC) by bboozzoo)

Package update notes

2.36

2.36 is the first release with AppArmor enabled by default on Arch.

If you do not have AppArmor enabled at boot there should be no functional changes visible.

If you wish to use snaps with Apparmor, first make sure that Apparmor is enabled during boot, see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/AppArmor for details. After upgrading the package, you need to do the following steps:

Reload the profiles: systemctl restart apparmor.service
Restart snapd: systemctl restart snapd.service
Load profiles for snaps: systemctl enable --now snapd.apparmor.service

2.62

Since 2.62 snapd generated additional files describing the sandbox. The snapd service needs to be restarted after the update for snaps to continue working (unless the system is rebooted after the update, in which case no additional steps are needed). To restart, run systemctl restart snapd.service

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 .. 24 Next › Last »

bboozzoo commented on 2021-05-28 16:49 (UTC)

@TheCultLeader666 try building in a clean chroot then: https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/DeveloperWiki:Building_in_a_clean_chroot#Classic_way

TheCultLeader666 commented on 2021-05-28 15:28 (UTC)

@bboozzoo I have the base-devel group installed, still getting the error

bboozzoo commented on 2021-05-28 15:25 (UTC)

@TheCultLeader666 make sure to have base-devel group installed.

TheCultLeader666 commented on 2021-05-28 15:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-05-28 15:22 (UTC) by TheCultLeader666)

I'm getting this error when installing, I've tried reinstalling gcc:

cgo: exec gcc-5: exec: "gcc-5": executable file not found in $PATH
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().
    Aborting...
error making: snapd

bboozzoo commented on 2021-04-26 07:12 (UTC)

@sighup_mae yes it is maintained. I did not see a reason to update as the changes in point releases were focused on Ubuntu Core. The 2.50 release brings some changes to the desktop, hence the package will be updated again. If you are eager to see an update each time the upstream creates a new tag, you are always welcome to send me a patch.

sighup_mae commented on 2021-04-26 07:06 (UTC)

Are the maintainers still active? Package has been out-of-date for over a month now.

bendavis78 commented on 2021-03-24 16:08 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-24 16:10 (UTC) by bendavis78)

I'm getting this error when running makepkg -i:

==> Starting check()...
snap-exec is not a static binary

yxgi5 commented on 2021-03-16 08:53 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-16 09:03 (UTC) by yxgi5)

Is there any solution?


make[1]: Leaving directory '/home/andy/.cache/yay/snapd/src/snapd-2.49.1/cmd'
==> Starting check()...
snap-exec is not a static binary
error making: snapd

ArchRob commented on 2021-02-27 22:36 (UTC)

@benalexau the tip about pkgconf helped. I was getting weird errors like:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/rst2man", line 26, in <module>
    publish_cmdline(writer=manpage.Writer(), description=description)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/core.py", line 352, in publish_cmdline
    pub.set_components(reader_name, parser_name, writer_name)
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/docutils/core.py", line 94, in set_component

I ran sudo pacman -S pkgconf. It was already installed, and pacman confirmed it was simply reinstalling. But after that, I was able to build this package without issue. No idea why, but it worked.